On 2/3/21 11:59 AM, Dr. David Alan Gilbert wrote:
> * Peter Maydell (peter.mayd...@linaro.org) wrote:
>> On Wed, 3 Feb 2021 at 10:49, Dr. David Alan Gilbert
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> * Peter Maydell (peter.mayd...@linaro.org) wrote:
On Wed, 3 Feb 2021 at 10:28, Dr. David Alan Gilbert
wrote:
>
On Feb 03 15:26, Peter Maydell wrote:
> On Wed, 3 Feb 2021 at 15:11, Dr. David Alan Gilbert
> wrote:
> > It's interesting that on x86 we've got a longterm request to *add* cpu
> > features to the stream to detect screwups caused by using mismatched
> > CPUs; so it's not necessarily a bad idea to
On Wed, Feb 03, 2021 at 10:45:47AM -0500, Aaron Lindsay wrote:
> On Feb 03 13:44, Andrew Jones wrote:
> > On Wed, Feb 03, 2021 at 10:52:59AM +, Peter Maydell wrote:
> > > On Wed, 3 Feb 2021 at 10:49, Dr. David Alan Gilbert
> > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > * Peter Maydell (peter.mayd...@linaro.org
On Feb 03 13:44, Andrew Jones wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 03, 2021 at 10:52:59AM +, Peter Maydell wrote:
> > On Wed, 3 Feb 2021 at 10:49, Dr. David Alan Gilbert
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > * Peter Maydell (peter.mayd...@linaro.org) wrote:
> > > > On Wed, 3 Feb 2021 at 10:28, Dr. David Alan Gilbert
> > >
On Feb 03 15:10, Dr. David Alan Gilbert wrote:
> * Philippe Mathieu-Daudé (phi...@redhat.com) wrote:
> > On 2/3/21 3:58 PM, Aaron Lindsay wrote:
> > > On Feb 03 10:01, Peter Maydell wrote:
> > >>> The third is that meanings of the bits in env->features (as defined by
> > >>> `enum arm_features` in
On Wed, 3 Feb 2021 at 15:11, Dr. David Alan Gilbert wrote:
> It's interesting that on x86 we've got a longterm request to *add* cpu
> features to the stream to detect screwups caused by using mismatched
> CPUs; so it's not necessarily a bad idea to include it once you realise
> it's there.
I thin
* Philippe Mathieu-Daudé (phi...@redhat.com) wrote:
> On 2/3/21 3:58 PM, Aaron Lindsay wrote:
> > On Feb 03 10:01, Peter Maydell wrote:
> >>> The third is that meanings of the bits in env->features (as defined by
> >>> `enum arm_features` in target/arm/cpu.h) has shifted. For example,
> >>> ARM_FEA
On 2/3/21 3:58 PM, Aaron Lindsay wrote:
> On Feb 03 10:01, Peter Maydell wrote:
>>> The third is that meanings of the bits in env->features (as defined by
>>> `enum arm_features` in target/arm/cpu.h) has shifted. For example,
>>> ARM_FEATURE_PXN, ARM_FEATURE_CRC, ARM_FEATURE_VFP, ARM_FEATURE_VFP3,
On Feb 03 10:01, Peter Maydell wrote:
> On Wed, 3 Feb 2021 at 04:01, Aaron Lindsay
> wrote:
> > Note that I'm using qemu-system-aarch64 with -loadvm.
>
> You don't say what machine type and command line you're using. Strictly,
> Strictly speaking, the intended guarantee only covers versioned
> m
On Wed, Feb 03, 2021 at 10:52:59AM +, Peter Maydell wrote:
> On Wed, 3 Feb 2021 at 10:49, Dr. David Alan Gilbert
> wrote:
> >
> > * Peter Maydell (peter.mayd...@linaro.org) wrote:
> > > On Wed, 3 Feb 2021 at 10:28, Dr. David Alan Gilbert
> > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > * Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
* Peter Maydell (peter.mayd...@linaro.org) wrote:
> On Wed, 3 Feb 2021 at 10:49, Dr. David Alan Gilbert
> wrote:
> >
> > * Peter Maydell (peter.mayd...@linaro.org) wrote:
> > > On Wed, 3 Feb 2021 at 10:28, Dr. David Alan Gilbert
> > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > * Philippe Mathieu-Daudé (phi...@redh
On Wed, 3 Feb 2021 at 10:49, Dr. David Alan Gilbert wrote:
>
> * Peter Maydell (peter.mayd...@linaro.org) wrote:
> > On Wed, 3 Feb 2021 at 10:28, Dr. David Alan Gilbert
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > * Philippe Mathieu-Daudé (phi...@redhat.com) wrote:
> > > > Cc'ing migration team and qemu-arm@ list.
>
* Peter Maydell (peter.mayd...@linaro.org) wrote:
> On Wed, 3 Feb 2021 at 10:28, Dr. David Alan Gilbert
> wrote:
> >
> > * Philippe Mathieu-Daudé (phi...@redhat.com) wrote:
> > > Cc'ing migration team and qemu-arm@ list.
> >
> > I'll have to leave the detail of that to the ARM peole; but from a
>
On Wed, 3 Feb 2021 at 10:28, Dr. David Alan Gilbert wrote:
>
> * Philippe Mathieu-Daudé (phi...@redhat.com) wrote:
> > Cc'ing migration team and qemu-arm@ list.
>
> I'll have to leave the detail of that to the ARM peole; but from a
> migration point of view I think we do want the 64 bit ARM migrat
* Philippe Mathieu-Daudé (phi...@redhat.com) wrote:
> Cc'ing migration team and qemu-arm@ list.
I'll have to leave the detail of that to the ARM peole; but from a
migration point of view I think we do want the 64 bit ARM migrations to
be stable now. Please tie incompatible changes to machine type
On Wed, 3 Feb 2021 at 04:01, Aaron Lindsay wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> I'm attempting to restore an AArch64 snapshot taken on QEMU 4.1.0 on
> QEMU 5.2.0, using system mode. My previous impression, possibly from
> https://wiki.qemu.org/Features/Migration/Troubleshooting#Basics was that
> this ought to wo
Cc'ing migration team and qemu-arm@ list.
On 2/3/21 5:01 AM, Aaron Lindsay wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I'm attempting to restore an AArch64 snapshot taken on QEMU 4.1.0 on
> QEMU 5.2.0, using system mode. My previous impression, possibly from
> https://wiki.qemu.org/Features/Migration/Troubleshooting#Bas
Hello,
I'm attempting to restore an AArch64 snapshot taken on QEMU 4.1.0 on
QEMU 5.2.0, using system mode. My previous impression, possibly from
https://wiki.qemu.org/Features/Migration/Troubleshooting#Basics was that
this ought to work:
> Note that QEMU supports migrating forward between QEMU ve
18 matches
Mail list logo
