Re: 9p: requests efficiency

2019-11-23 Thread Christian Schoenebeck
On Donnerstag, 21. November 2019 00:37:36 CET Christian Schoenebeck wrote: > If so, I haven't understood how precisely v9fs_co_run_in_worker() works. I > mean I understand now how QEMU coroutines are working, and the idea of > v9fs_co_run_in_worker() is dispatching the passed code block to the work

Re: 9p: requests efficiency

2019-11-20 Thread Christian Schoenebeck
On Freitag, 15. November 2019 14:26:56 CET Greg Kurz wrote: > > However when there are a large number of (i.e. small) 9p requests, no > > matter what the actual request type is, then I am encountering severe > > performance issues with 9pfs and I try to understand whether this could > > be improved

Re: 9p: requests efficiency

2019-11-15 Thread Greg Kurz
On Fri, 15 Nov 2019 02:10:50 +0100 Christian Schoenebeck wrote: > I'm currently reading up on how client requests (T messages) are currently > dispatched in general by 9pfs, to understand where potential inefficiencies > are that I am encountering. > > I mean 9pfs is pretty fast on raw I/O (re

9p: requests efficiency

2019-11-14 Thread Christian Schoenebeck
I'm currently reading up on how client requests (T messages) are currently dispatched in general by 9pfs, to understand where potential inefficiencies are that I am encountering. I mean 9pfs is pretty fast on raw I/O (read/write requests), provided that the message payload on guest side was cho