> On Mar 4, 2021, at 2:21 PM, Jonathan Cameron
> wrote:
>
> On Tue, 9 Feb 2021 15:35:49 -0500
> Chris Browy wrote:
>
> Hi Chris,
>
> One more thing hit whilst debugging linux side of this.
>
>> +static void pcie_doe_irq_assert(DOECap *doe_cap)
>> +{
>> +PCIDevice *dev = doe_cap->doe->
On Tue, 9 Feb 2021 15:35:49 -0500
Chris Browy wrote:
Hi Chris,
One more thing hit whilst debugging linux side of this.
> +static void pcie_doe_irq_assert(DOECap *doe_cap)
> +{
> +PCIDevice *dev = doe_cap->doe->pdev;
> +
> +if (doe_cap->cap.intr && doe_cap->ctrl.intr) {
need something
On Thu, 18 Feb 2021 19:46:54 -0500
Chris Browy wrote:
> > On Feb 18, 2021, at 2:11 PM, Jonathan Cameron
> > wrote:
> >
> > On Fri, 12 Feb 2021 16:58:21 -0500
> > Chris Browy wrote:
> >
> >>> On Feb 12, 2021, at 11:24 AM, Jonathan Cameron
> >>> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> On Tue, 9 Feb 2021 15:35
> On Feb 18, 2021, at 2:11 PM, Jonathan Cameron
> wrote:
>
> On Fri, 12 Feb 2021 16:58:21 -0500
> Chris Browy wrote:
>
>>> On Feb 12, 2021, at 11:24 AM, Jonathan Cameron
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>> On Tue, 9 Feb 2021 15:35:49 -0500
>>> Chris Browy wrote:
>>>
>>> Run ./scripts/checkpatch.pl over
On Fri, 12 Feb 2021 16:58:21 -0500
Chris Browy wrote:
> > On Feb 12, 2021, at 11:24 AM, Jonathan Cameron
> > wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, 9 Feb 2021 15:35:49 -0500
> > Chris Browy wrote:
> >
> > Run ./scripts/checkpatch.pl over the patches and fix all the warnings before
> > posting. It will save
> On Feb 12, 2021, at 11:24 AM, Jonathan Cameron
> wrote:
>
> On Tue, 9 Feb 2021 15:35:49 -0500
> Chris Browy wrote:
>
> Run ./scripts/checkpatch.pl over the patches and fix all the warnings before
> posting. It will save time by clearing out most of the minor formatting
> issues
> and si
On Tue, 9 Feb 2021 15:35:49 -0500
Chris Browy wrote:
Run ./scripts/checkpatch.pl over the patches and fix all the warnings before
posting. It will save time by clearing out most of the minor formatting issues
and similar that inevitably sneak in during development.
The biggest issue I'm seeing
No consensus yet but I’d suggest that we’ll do the QEMU work and Jonathan
focuses
on the linux kernel and UEFI/edk2 and CXL SSWG efforts. Seems like
a way to maximize resources and everyone’s contribution and expertise. QEMU
part
requires the least expertise which is why we’re best suited for
Have you/Jonathan come to consensus about which implementation is going forward?
I'd rather not have to review two :D
On 21-02-09 15:35:49, Chris Browy wrote:
> ---
> MAINTAINERS | 7 +
> hw/pci/meson.build| 1 +
> hw/pci/pcie.c
---
MAINTAINERS | 7 +
hw/pci/meson.build| 1 +
hw/pci/pcie.c | 2 +-
hw/pci/pcie_doe.c | 414 ++
include/hw/pci/pci_ids.h | 2 +
include/h
10 matches
Mail list logo
