On Thursday, 2021-07-08 at 08:22:02 -07, Richard Henderson wrote:
> On 7/8/21 12:45 AM, David Edmondson wrote:
>> Actually, that's nonsense. With KVM or HVF we have to use the offsets of
>> the host CPU, as the hardware won't do anything else, irrespective of
>> the general CPU model chosen.
>>
>
On 7/8/21 12:45 AM, David Edmondson wrote:
Actually, that's nonsense. With KVM or HVF we have to use the offsets of
the host CPU, as the hardware won't do anything else, irrespective of
the general CPU model chosen.
To have KVM -> TCG migration work it would be necessary to pass the
offsets in t
On Wednesday, 2021-07-07 at 11:10:21 +01, David Edmondson wrote:
> On Tuesday, 2021-07-06 at 18:09:42 -07, Richard Henderson wrote:
>
>> On 7/5/21 3:46 AM, David Edmondson wrote:
>>> Given that TCG is now the only consumer of X86XSaveArea, move the
>>> structure definition and associated offset de
On Tuesday, 2021-07-06 at 18:09:42 -07, Richard Henderson wrote:
> On 7/5/21 3:46 AM, David Edmondson wrote:
>> Given that TCG is now the only consumer of X86XSaveArea, move the
>> structure definition and associated offset declarations and checks to a
>> TCG specific header.
>>
>> Signed-off-by:
Migration from KVM to TCG is broken anyway. The changing offsets do break
migration of a KVM guest from Intel to AMD or vice versa, because of the
difference in CPUID. That however is not changed by this patch.
Paolo
Il mer 7 lug 2021, 03:09 Richard Henderson
ha scritto:
> On 7/5/21 3:46 AM, Da
On 7/5/21 3:46 AM, David Edmondson wrote:
Given that TCG is now the only consumer of X86XSaveArea, move the
structure definition and associated offset declarations and checks to a
TCG specific header.
Signed-off-by: David Edmondson
---
target/i386/cpu.h| 57 ---
Given that TCG is now the only consumer of X86XSaveArea, move the
structure definition and associated offset declarations and checks to a
TCG specific header.
Signed-off-by: David Edmondson
---
target/i386/cpu.h| 57
target/i386/tcg/fpu_helper.c |
