On 7/10/20 11:27 AM, Bin Meng wrote:
> Hi Philippe,
>
> On Mon, Jul 6, 2020 at 6:07 AM Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote:
>>
>> I tried to maintain the SPI mode because it is useful in
>> tiny embedded devices, and thought it would be helpful for
>> the AVR MCUs.
>> As AVR was blocked, I thought it wa
Hi Philippe,
On Mon, Jul 6, 2020 at 6:07 AM Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote:
>
> I tried to maintain the SPI mode because it is useful in
> tiny embedded devices, and thought it would be helpful for
> the AVR MCUs.
> As AVR was blocked, I thought it was wise to deprecate the
> SPI mode as users are
On 7/6/20 6:41 PM, Alistair Francis wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 5, 2020 at 3:08 PM Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote:
>>
>> I tried to maintain the SPI mode because it is useful in
>> tiny embedded devices, and thought it would be helpful for
>> the AVR MCUs.
>> As AVR was blocked, I thought it was wise to de
On Sun, Jul 5, 2020 at 3:08 PM Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote:
>
> I tried to maintain the SPI mode because it is useful in
> tiny embedded devices, and thought it would be helpful for
> the AVR MCUs.
> As AVR was blocked, I thought it was wise to deprecate the
> SPI mode as users are interested in
I tried to maintain the SPI mode because it is useful in
tiny embedded devices, and thought it would be helpful for
the AVR MCUs.
As AVR was blocked, I thought it was wise to deprecate the
SPI mode as users are interested in the faster MMC mode.
Today Thomas surprised me by posting an update of it!
