On Fri, 2023-03-03 at 13:38 +0100, Thomas Huth wrote:
> On 21/02/2023 18.45, jro...@linux.ibm.com wrote:
> > From: Jared Rossi
> >
> > Check for a List Directed IPL Boot Record, which would supersede
> > the CCW type
> > entries. If the record is valid, proceed to use the new style
> > pointers
Sounds good. Thanks Thomas.
Regards,
Jared Rossi
On 3/6/23 7:12 AM, Thomas Huth wrote:
On 21/02/2023 18.45, jro...@linux.ibm.com wrote:
From: Jared Rossi
Check for a List Directed IPL Boot Record, which would supersede the
CCW type
entries. If the record is valid, proceed to use the new
On 21/02/2023 18.45, jro...@linux.ibm.com wrote:
From: Jared Rossi
Check for a List Directed IPL Boot Record, which would supersede the CCW type
entries. If the record is valid, proceed to use the new style pointers
and perform LD-IPL. Each block pointer is interpreted as either an LD-IPL
poin
On 21/02/2023 18.45, jro...@linux.ibm.com wrote:
From: Jared Rossi
Check for a List Directed IPL Boot Record, which would supersede the CCW type
entries. If the record is valid, proceed to use the new style pointers
and perform LD-IPL. Each block pointer is interpreted as either an LD-IPL
poin
On 21/02/2023 18.45, jro...@linux.ibm.com wrote:
From: Jared Rossi
Check for a List Directed IPL Boot Record, which would supersede the CCW type
entries. If the record is valid, proceed to use the new style pointers
and perform LD-IPL. Each block pointer is interpreted as either an LD-IPL
poin
From: Jared Rossi
Check for a List Directed IPL Boot Record, which would supersede the CCW type
entries. If the record is valid, proceed to use the new style pointers
and perform LD-IPL. Each block pointer is interpreted as either an LD-IPL
pointer or a legacy CCW pointer depending on the type o
