On 21.02.2012 17:48, Vadim Rozenfeld wrote:
- Original Message -
From: "Peter Lieven"
To: "Vadim Rozenfeld"
Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org, k...@vger.kernel.org, "Gleb Natapov"
Sent: Tuesday, February 21, 2012 4:10:22 PM
Subject: Re: win7 bad i/o performance, high insn_emulation and exists
O
- Original Message -
From: "Peter Lieven"
To: "Vadim Rozenfeld"
Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org, k...@vger.kernel.org, "Gleb Natapov"
Sent: Tuesday, February 21, 2012 4:10:22 PM
Subject: Re: win7 bad i/o performance, high insn_emulation and exists
On 21.02.2012 14:56, Vadim Rozenfeld wrote
On 21.02.2012 14:56, Vadim Rozenfeld wrote:
- Original Message -
From: "Peter Lieven"
To: "Gleb Natapov"
Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org, k...@vger.kernel.org, vroze...@redhat.com
Sent: Tuesday, February 21, 2012 2:05:25 PM
Subject: Re: win7 bad i/o performance, high insn_emulation and exists
- Original Message -
From: "Peter Lieven"
To: "Gleb Natapov"
Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org, k...@vger.kernel.org, vroze...@redhat.com
Sent: Tuesday, February 21, 2012 2:05:25 PM
Subject: Re: win7 bad i/o performance, high insn_emulation and exists
On 21.02.2012 12:46, Gleb Natapov wrote:
>
On 21.02.2012 12:46, Gleb Natapov wrote:
On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 12:16:16PM +0100, Peter Lieven wrote:
On 21.02.2012 12:00, Gleb Natapov wrote:
On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 11:59:23AM +0100, Peter Lieven wrote:
On 21.02.2012 11:56, Gleb Natapov wrote:
On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 11:50:47AM +0100, Pete
On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 12:16:16PM +0100, Peter Lieven wrote:
> On 21.02.2012 12:00, Gleb Natapov wrote:
> >On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 11:59:23AM +0100, Peter Lieven wrote:
> >>On 21.02.2012 11:56, Gleb Natapov wrote:
> >>>On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 11:50:47AM +0100, Peter Lieven wrote:
> >I hope it
On 21.02.2012 11:56, Gleb Natapov wrote:
On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 11:50:47AM +0100, Peter Lieven wrote:
I hope it will make Windows use TSC instead, but you can't be sure
about anything with Windows :(
Whatever it does now it eates more CPU has almost equal
number of exits and throughput is abou
On 21.02.2012 12:00, Gleb Natapov wrote:
On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 11:59:23AM +0100, Peter Lieven wrote:
On 21.02.2012 11:56, Gleb Natapov wrote:
On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 11:50:47AM +0100, Peter Lieven wrote:
I hope it will make Windows use TSC instead, but you can't be sure
about anything with W
On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 11:59:23AM +0100, Peter Lieven wrote:
> On 21.02.2012 11:56, Gleb Natapov wrote:
> >On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 11:50:47AM +0100, Peter Lieven wrote:
> >>>I hope it will make Windows use TSC instead, but you can't be sure
> >>>about anything with Windows :(
> >>Whatever it does
On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 11:50:47AM +0100, Peter Lieven wrote:
> >I hope it will make Windows use TSC instead, but you can't be sure
> >about anything with Windows :(
> Whatever it does now it eates more CPU has almost equal
> number of exits and throughput is about the same (15MB/s).
> If pmtimer i
On 20.02.2012 21:45, Gleb Natapov wrote:
On Mon, Feb 20, 2012 at 08:59:38PM +0100, Peter Lieven wrote:
On 20.02.2012 20:04, Gleb Natapov wrote:
On Mon, Feb 20, 2012 at 08:40:08PM +0200, Gleb Natapov wrote:
On Mon, Feb 20, 2012 at 07:17:55PM +0100, Peter Lieven wrote:
Hi,
I came a across an i
On Mon, Feb 20, 2012 at 08:59:38PM +0100, Peter Lieven wrote:
> On 20.02.2012 20:04, Gleb Natapov wrote:
> >On Mon, Feb 20, 2012 at 08:40:08PM +0200, Gleb Natapov wrote:
> >>On Mon, Feb 20, 2012 at 07:17:55PM +0100, Peter Lieven wrote:
> >>>Hi,
> >>>
> >>>I came a across an issue with a Windows 7 (
On Mon, Feb 20, 2012 at 08:15:15PM +0100, Peter Lieven wrote:
> On 20.02.2012 19:40, Gleb Natapov wrote:
> >On Mon, Feb 20, 2012 at 07:17:55PM +0100, Peter Lieven wrote:
> >>Hi,
> >>
> >>I came a across an issue with a Windows 7 (32-bit) as well as with a
> >>Windows 2008 R2 (64-bit) guest.
> >>
>
On 20.02.2012 20:04, Gleb Natapov wrote:
On Mon, Feb 20, 2012 at 08:40:08PM +0200, Gleb Natapov wrote:
On Mon, Feb 20, 2012 at 07:17:55PM +0100, Peter Lieven wrote:
Hi,
I came a across an issue with a Windows 7 (32-bit) as well as with a
Windows 2008 R2 (64-bit) guest.
If I transfer a file fr
On 20.02.2012 20:04, Gleb Natapov wrote:
On Mon, Feb 20, 2012 at 08:40:08PM +0200, Gleb Natapov wrote:
On Mon, Feb 20, 2012 at 07:17:55PM +0100, Peter Lieven wrote:
Hi,
I came a across an issue with a Windows 7 (32-bit) as well as with a
Windows 2008 R2 (64-bit) guest.
If I transfer a file fr
On 20.02.2012 19:40, Gleb Natapov wrote:
On Mon, Feb 20, 2012 at 07:17:55PM +0100, Peter Lieven wrote:
Hi,
I came a across an issue with a Windows 7 (32-bit) as well as with a
Windows 2008 R2 (64-bit) guest.
If I transfer a file from the VM via CIFS or FTP to a remote machine,
i get very poor
On Mon, Feb 20, 2012 at 08:40:08PM +0200, Gleb Natapov wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 20, 2012 at 07:17:55PM +0100, Peter Lieven wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I came a across an issue with a Windows 7 (32-bit) as well as with a
> > Windows 2008 R2 (64-bit) guest.
> >
> > If I transfer a file from the VM via CIFS
On Mon, Feb 20, 2012 at 07:17:55PM +0100, Peter Lieven wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I came a across an issue with a Windows 7 (32-bit) as well as with a
> Windows 2008 R2 (64-bit) guest.
>
> If I transfer a file from the VM via CIFS or FTP to a remote machine,
> i get very poor read performance (around 13MB/
Hi,
I came a across an issue with a Windows 7 (32-bit) as well as with a
Windows 2008 R2 (64-bit) guest.
If I transfer a file from the VM via CIFS or FTP to a remote machine,
i get very poor read performance (around 13MB/s). The VM peaks at 100%
cpu and I see a lot of insn_emulations and all k
19 matches
Mail list logo
