On Wed, Jun 8, 2011 at 3:55 PM, Kevin Wolf wrote:
> Am 08.06.2011 16:17, schrieb Fam Zheng:
>> Oh, you're right, and I think there is a patch of mine related to the fail:
>>
>> "[PATCH 02/12] VMDK: bugfix, align offset to cluster in get_whole_cluster"
>>
>> Can you test if this fixes it?
>
> Thank
Am 08.06.2011 16:17, schrieb Fam Zheng:
> Oh, you're right, and I think there is a patch of mine related to the fail:
>
> "[PATCH 02/12] VMDK: bugfix, align offset to cluster in get_whole_cluster"
>
> Can you test if this fixes it?
Thanks, this works for me.
However, I had to fix your patch man
Oh, you're right, and I think there is a patch of mine related to the fail:
"[PATCH 02/12] VMDK: bugfix, align offset to cluster in get_whole_cluster"
Can you test if this fixes it?
On Wed, Jun 8, 2011 at 9:52 PM, Kevin Wolf wrote:
> Am 08.06.2011 15:29, schrieb Fam Zheng:
>> Yes I noticed the
Am 08.06.2011 15:29, schrieb Fam Zheng:
> Yes I noticed the failure, but it's trivial mismatch between `qemu-img
> create` output. The old test case has "cluster_size=65536" but I find
> the latest qemu-img omits this info, as the diff:
>
> -Formatting 'TEST_DIR/t.IMGFMT', fmt=IMGFMT size=64424509
Yes I noticed the failure, but it's trivial mismatch between `qemu-img
create` output. The old test case has "cluster_size=65536" but I find
the latest qemu-img omits this info, as the diff:
-Formatting 'TEST_DIR/t.IMGFMT', fmt=IMGFMT size=6442450944 cluster_size=65536
+Formatting 'TEST_DIR/t.IMGF
Hi Fam,
now that I had a VMDK patch in the queue for the first time since quite
a while, I ran qemu-iotests for VMDK and I noticed that test case 019
fails. It doesn't seem to be a regression, even 0.14 and 0.13 fail it.
I think you're running qemu-iotests to check your VMDK patches, so I
wonder
