On Wed, 12 Nov 2014 21:30:20 +0100
Laszlo Ersek wrote:
> adding back a few CC's because this discussion is useful
>
> On 11/12/14 19:43, Petr Tesarik wrote:
> > V Wed, 12 Nov 2014 15:50:32 +0100
> > Laszlo Ersek napsáno:
> >
> >> On 11/12/14 09:04, Petr Tesarik wrote:
> >>> On Wed, 12 Nov 2014
On Wed, 12 Nov 2014 10:43:59 -0500
Christopher Covington wrote:
> On 11/12/2014 10:03 AM, Laszlo Ersek wrote:
> > On 11/12/14 15:48, Christopher Covington wrote:
> >> Thanks Petr and Laszlo for entertaining my questions. I've got one last
> >> one if
> >> you have the time.
> >>
> >> On 11/12/20
- Original Message -
> adding back a few CC's because this discussion is useful
>
> On 11/12/14 19:43, Petr Tesarik wrote:
> > V Wed, 12 Nov 2014 15:50:32 +0100
> > Laszlo Ersek napsáno:
> >
> >> On 11/12/14 09:04, Petr Tesarik wrote:
> >>> On Wed, 12 Nov 2014 12:08:38 +0900 (JST)
> >>
adding back a few CC's because this discussion is useful
On 11/12/14 19:43, Petr Tesarik wrote:
> V Wed, 12 Nov 2014 15:50:32 +0100
> Laszlo Ersek napsáno:
>
>> On 11/12/14 09:04, Petr Tesarik wrote:
>>> On Wed, 12 Nov 2014 12:08:38 +0900 (JST)
>>> HATAYAMA Daisuke wrote:
>>
Anyway, phys_b
On 11/12/2014 10:03 AM, Laszlo Ersek wrote:
> On 11/12/14 15:48, Christopher Covington wrote:
>> Thanks Petr and Laszlo for entertaining my questions. I've got one last one
>> if
>> you have the time.
>>
>> On 11/12/2014 09:10 AM, Laszlo Ersek wrote:
>>> On 11/12/14 14:26, Petr Tesarik wrote:
On 11/12/14 15:48, Christopher Covington wrote:
> Thanks Petr and Laszlo for entertaining my questions. I've got one last one if
> you have the time.
>
> On 11/12/2014 09:10 AM, Laszlo Ersek wrote:
>> On 11/12/14 14:26, Petr Tesarik wrote:
>>> On Wed, 12 Nov 2014 08:18:04 -0500
>>> Christopher Cov
Thanks Petr and Laszlo for entertaining my questions. I've got one last one if
you have the time.
On 11/12/2014 09:10 AM, Laszlo Ersek wrote:
> On 11/12/14 14:26, Petr Tesarik wrote:
>> On Wed, 12 Nov 2014 08:18:04 -0500
>> Christopher Covington wrote:
>>
>>> On 11/12/2014 03:05 AM, Petr Tesarik
On 11/12/14 14:28, Christopher Covington wrote:
> On 11/12/2014 08:26 AM, Petr Tesarik wrote:
>> On Wed, 12 Nov 2014 08:18:04 -0500
>> Christopher Covington wrote:
>>
>>> On 11/12/2014 03:05 AM, Petr Tesarik wrote:
On Tue, 11 Nov 2014 12:27:44 -0500
Christopher Covington wrote:
>>>
On 11/11/14 18:27, Christopher Covington wrote:
> On 11/11/2014 06:22 AM, Laszlo Ersek wrote:
>> (Note: I'm not subscribed to either qemu-devel or the kexec list; please
>> keep me CC'd.)
>>
>> QEMU is able to dump the guest's memory in KDUMP format (kdump-zlib,
>> kdump-lzo, kdump-snappy) with the
V Wed, 12 Nov 2014 08:28:54 -0500
Christopher Covington napsáno:
> On 11/12/2014 08:26 AM, Petr Tesarik wrote:
> > On Wed, 12 Nov 2014 08:18:04 -0500
> > Christopher Covington wrote:
> >
> >> On 11/12/2014 03:05 AM, Petr Tesarik wrote:
> >>> On Tue, 11 Nov 2014 12:27:44 -0500
> >>> Christopher
On 11/12/14 14:26, Petr Tesarik wrote:
> On Wed, 12 Nov 2014 08:18:04 -0500
> Christopher Covington wrote:
>
>> On 11/12/2014 03:05 AM, Petr Tesarik wrote:
>>> On Tue, 11 Nov 2014 12:27:44 -0500
>>> Christopher Covington wrote:
>>>
On 11/11/2014 06:22 AM, Laszlo Ersek wrote:
> (Note: I'
On Tue, 11 Nov 2014 12:27:44 -0500
Christopher Covington wrote:
> On 11/11/2014 06:22 AM, Laszlo Ersek wrote:
> > (Note: I'm not subscribed to either qemu-devel or the kexec list; please
> > keep me CC'd.)
> >
> > QEMU is able to dump the guest's memory in KDUMP format (kdump-zlib,
> > kdump-lzo
On Wed, 12 Nov 2014 08:18:04 -0500
Christopher Covington wrote:
> On 11/12/2014 03:05 AM, Petr Tesarik wrote:
> > On Tue, 11 Nov 2014 12:27:44 -0500
> > Christopher Covington wrote:
> >
> >> On 11/11/2014 06:22 AM, Laszlo Ersek wrote:
> >>> (Note: I'm not subscribed to either qemu-devel or the
On 11/12/2014 08:26 AM, Petr Tesarik wrote:
> On Wed, 12 Nov 2014 08:18:04 -0500
> Christopher Covington wrote:
>
>> On 11/12/2014 03:05 AM, Petr Tesarik wrote:
>>> On Tue, 11 Nov 2014 12:27:44 -0500
>>> Christopher Covington wrote:
>>>
On 11/11/2014 06:22 AM, Laszlo Ersek wrote:
> (Not
On 11/12/2014 03:05 AM, Petr Tesarik wrote:
> On Tue, 11 Nov 2014 12:27:44 -0500
> Christopher Covington wrote:
>
>> On 11/11/2014 06:22 AM, Laszlo Ersek wrote:
>>> (Note: I'm not subscribed to either qemu-devel or the kexec list; please
>>> keep me CC'd.)
>>>
>>> QEMU is able to dump the guest's
On 11/11/2014 06:22 AM, Laszlo Ersek wrote:
> (Note: I'm not subscribed to either qemu-devel or the kexec list; please
> keep me CC'd.)
>
> QEMU is able to dump the guest's memory in KDUMP format (kdump-zlib,
> kdump-lzo, kdump-snappy) with the "dump-guest-memory" QMP command.
>
> The resultant v
On 11 November 2014 11:22, Laszlo Ersek wrote:
> For this reason, the kdump preparation logic in QEMU hardcodes a number
> of fields in the kdump header. The direct issue is the "phys_base"
> field. Refer to dump.c, functions create_header32(), create_header64(),
> and "include/sysemu/dump.h", mac
(Note: I'm not subscribed to either qemu-devel or the kexec list; please
keep me CC'd.)
QEMU is able to dump the guest's memory in KDUMP format (kdump-zlib,
kdump-lzo, kdump-snappy) with the "dump-guest-memory" QMP command.
The resultant vmcore is usually analyzed with the "crash" utility.
The o
18 matches
Mail list logo