Hi
On Mon, May 14, 2012 at 10:55 PM, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>> you meant, "the receiving thread", right?
>
> No, in the sending thread. That's why I said it is not exactly the same
> thing.
>
> Paolo
Interesting...thanks for the clarification...
--
regards,
Mulyadi Santosa
Freelance Linux
Il 14/05/2012 17:51, Mulyadi Santosa ha scritto:
> Hi...
>
> On Mon, May 14, 2012 at 3:39 PM, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>> It doesn't use sigaction. :) Whenever the POSIX version would send a
>> signal to a thread, the Windows version does the following:
>>
>> - call SuspendThread on the receiving th
Hi...
On Mon, May 14, 2012 at 3:39 PM, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> It doesn't use sigaction. :) Whenever the POSIX version would send a
> signal to a thread, the Windows version does the following:
>
> - call SuspendThread on the receiving thread;
>
> - execute the signal handler code in the sending
Il 14/05/2012 05:47, bang bang ha scritto:
> Hi, everyone:
> I am very sorry to trouble you, but I have a question that need
> your help. As we know, sigaction is not defined in windows, but qemu can
> run on windows, I want to know how the qemu to implement sigaction so
> that it can run on w
Hi, everyone:
I am very sorry to trouble you, but I have a question that need your
help. As we know, sigaction is not defined in windows, but qemu can run on
windows, I want to know how the qemu to implement sigaction so that it can
run on windows an linux. I am very sorry to not find their im
