On 09/20/11 17:00, Jan Kiszka wrote:
On 2011-09-20 16:48, Gerd Hoffmann wrote:
On 09/20/11 16:27, Jan Kiszka wrote:
Hi Gerd,
can you (or anyone familiar with those bits) comment on pthread_yield()
in ioport_write() of hw/qxl.c? Which threads are supposed to run this
way?
spice server thread
On 2011-09-20 16:48, Gerd Hoffmann wrote:
> On 09/20/11 16:27, Jan Kiszka wrote:
>> Hi Gerd,
>>
>> can you (or anyone familiar with those bits) comment on pthread_yield()
>> in ioport_write() of hw/qxl.c? Which threads are supposed to run this
>> way?
>
> spice server thread.
>
>> Can't this rel
On 09/20/11 16:27, Jan Kiszka wrote:
Hi Gerd,
can you (or anyone familiar with those bits) comment on pthread_yield()
in ioport_write() of hw/qxl.c? Which threads are supposed to run this
way?
spice server thread.
Can't this relation be expressed explicitly?
The thread is created by libsp
Hi Gerd,
can you (or anyone familiar with those bits) comment on pthread_yield()
in ioport_write() of hw/qxl.c? Which threads are supposed to run this
way? Can't this relation be expressed explicitly? If not, can we use a
sleep here (how long?)?
The background is that yielding easily breaks into
