On Mon, Apr 08, 2013 at 01:01:53PM +, Zhangleiqiang wrote:
> I guess maybe the non-dataplane already reached the physical disk's IOPS
> upper limit in the scenario above so that data plane didn't make a difference?
Yes.
Stefan
> -Original Message-
> From: Stefan Hajnoczi [mailto:stefa...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Monday, April 08, 2013 7:09 PM
>
> On Sun, Apr 07, 2013 at 09:05:47AM -0500, Anthony Liguori wrote:
> > Zhangleiqiang writes:
> >
> > > 1. Environment:
> > > a). Qemu 1.4 master branch
> > > b). kernel:
On Sun, Apr 07, 2013 at 09:05:47AM -0500, Anthony Liguori wrote:
> Zhangleiqiang writes:
>
> > Hi, Stefan：
> >
> > I have done some testing to compare the performance of dataplane and
> > non-dataplane. But the result did not meet my expectations, the
> > performance of disk with dataplane
Zhangleiqiang writes:
> Hi, Stefan：
>
> I have done some testing to compare the performance of dataplane and
> non-dataplane. But the result did not meet my expectations, the performance
> of disk with dataplane enabled did not have advantage over non-dataplane.
>
> The following
Hi, Stefan：
I have done some testing to compare the performance of dataplane and
non-dataplane. But the result did not meet my expectations, the performance of
disk with dataplane enabled did not have advantage over non-dataplane.
The following contains the environment info
