On Thursday 11 October 2007 2:15:25 am Rob Landley wrote:
> Back in July, Andreas Schwab posted a patch to upgrade the coldfire support
> to full m68k support (or at least the instructions output by gcc):
> http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2007-07/msg00015.html
Has there been any progr
On Thu, Oct 11, 2007 at 02:15:25AM -0500, Rob Landley wrote:
> On Wednesday 10 October 2007 10:20:41 pm Ian Graeme Hilt wrote:
> > On Wed, Oct 10, 2007 at 06:20:57PM -0500, Rob Landley wrote:
> > > On Saturday 06 October 2007 8:59:02 pm Ian Graeme Hilt wrote:
> > > > Two questions:
> > > >
> > > >
On Wednesday 10 October 2007 10:20:41 pm Ian Graeme Hilt wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 10, 2007 at 06:20:57PM -0500, Rob Landley wrote:
> > On Saturday 06 October 2007 8:59:02 pm Ian Graeme Hilt wrote:
> > > Two questions:
> > >
> > > 1. Why does qemu-system-m68k require a kernel image?
> >
> > I'd actually
On Wed, Oct 10, 2007 at 06:20:57PM -0500, Rob Landley wrote:
> On Saturday 06 October 2007 8:59:02 pm Ian Graeme Hilt wrote:
> > Two questions:
> >
> > 1. Why does qemu-system-m68k require a kernel image?
>
> I'd actually be pretty happy if I could figure out which kernel image I could
> build th
On Saturday 06 October 2007 8:59:02 pm Ian Graeme Hilt wrote:
> Two questions:
>
> 1. Why does qemu-system-m68k require a kernel image?
I'd actually be pretty happy if I could figure out which kernel image I could
build that the sucker would boot.
"qemu-system-m68k -M ?" lists two boards: the mc
Two questions:
1. Why does qemu-system-m68k require a kernel image?
2. Is support planned for booting m68k bootable images, e.g. floppy
images, harddrive images?
--
Ian Graeme Hilt
