CVSROOT:/cvsroot/qemu
Module name:qemu
Changes by: Blue Swirl 07/12/11 19:33:21
Modified files:
pc-bios: README openbios-sparc32 openbios-sparc64
Log message:
Update OpenBIOS images to SVN revision 181. Changes:
r177:
Reset fixes:
CVSROOT:/cvsroot/qemu
Module name:qemu
Changes by: Blue Swirl 07/11/14 19:41:26
Modified files:
pc-bios: README openbios-sparc32 openbios-sparc64
Log message:
Update OpenBIOS image to SVN revision 176. Changes:
r172: Enable boot mode in the excep
CVSROOT:/cvsroot/qemu
Module name:qemu
Changes by: Blue Swirl 07/08/11 08:16:01
Modified files:
pc-bios: README openbios-sparc32 openbios-sparc64
Log message:
r158: Fix wrong number of clean/saveable windows
r159: Revert previous patch
r1
Hi,
On Thu, 28 Jun 2007, Blue Swirl wrote:
> On 6/28/07, Johannes Schindelin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Thu, 28 Jun 2007, Blue Swirl wrote:
> >
> > > Update Sparc32 and Sparc64 OpenBIOS image to SVN revision 157.
> >
> > Since when is QEmu tracked with Subversion?
>
> OpenBIOS SVN
On 6/28/07, Johannes Schindelin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi,
On Thu, 28 Jun 2007, Blue Swirl wrote:
> Update Sparc32 and Sparc64 OpenBIOS image to SVN revision 157.
Since when is QEmu tracked with Subversion?
OpenBIOS SVN, not QEMU.
Hi,
On Thu, 28 Jun 2007, Blue Swirl wrote:
> Update Sparc32 and Sparc64 OpenBIOS image to SVN revision 157.
Since when is QEmu tracked with Subversion?
Thanks,
Dscho
CVSROOT:/cvsroot/qemu
Module name:qemu
Changes by: Blue Swirl 07/06/28 07:28:22
Modified files:
pc-bios: README openbios-sparc32 openbios-sparc64
Log message:
Update Sparc32 and Sparc64 OpenBIOS image to SVN revision 157. Changes:
r150: Try to fi
CVSROOT:/cvsroot/qemu
Module name:qemu
Changes by: Blue Swirl 07/04/16 17:41:15
Modified files:
pc-bios: README openbios-sparc32 openbios-sparc64
Log message:
Update OpenBIOS Sparc images to SVN 125
CVSWeb URLs:
http://cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/qemu/
On 4/16/07, Daniel Jacobowitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Mon, Apr 16, 2007 at 06:01:04PM +0300, Blue Swirl wrote:
> I stand corrected. Is there anything that can be done to reduce this waste?
For a BIOS image, you might be OK with ld -N - that should suppress
the padding.
Thanks, size is sm
Blue Swirl wrote:
> On 4/16/07, Daniel Jacobowitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >On Sun, Apr 15, 2007 at 10:37:08PM +0300, Blue Swirl wrote:
> >> On 4/15/07, Paul Brook <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> > On Sunday 15 April 2007 20:11, Blue Swirl wrote:
> >> > > > Probably the linker is making sure th
On Mon, Apr 16, 2007 at 06:01:04PM +0300, Blue Swirl wrote:
> I stand corrected. Is there anything that can be done to reduce this waste?
For a BIOS image, you might be OK with ld -N - that should suppress
the padding.
--
Daniel Jacobowitz
CodeSourcery
On 4/16/07, Daniel Jacobowitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Sun, Apr 15, 2007 at 10:37:08PM +0300, Blue Swirl wrote:
> On 4/15/07, Paul Brook <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Sunday 15 April 2007 20:11, Blue Swirl wrote:
> > > > Probably the linker is making sure the file offset and VMA are the
On Sun, Apr 15, 2007 at 10:37:08PM +0300, Blue Swirl wrote:
> On 4/15/07, Paul Brook <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Sunday 15 April 2007 20:11, Blue Swirl wrote:
> > > > Probably the linker is making sure the file offset and VMA are the same
> > > > modulo the page size.
> > >
> > > But that wou
On 4/15/07, Paul Brook <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Sunday 15 April 2007 20:11, Blue Swirl wrote:
> > Probably the linker is making sure the file offset and VMA are the same
> > modulo the page size.
>
> But that would be one huge file, as the VMA is near 2TB:
I said *modulo the pace size* :-)
On Sunday 15 April 2007 20:11, Blue Swirl wrote:
> > Probably the linker is making sure the file offset and VMA are the same
> > modulo the page size.
>
> But that would be one huge file, as the VMA is near 2TB:
I said *modulo the pace size* :-)
Lets say ld thinks the page size for your system is
Probably the linker is making sure the file offset and VMA are the same modulo
the page size.
But that would be one huge file, as the VMA is near 2TB:
pc-bios/openbios-sparc64: file format elf64-sparc
pc-bios/openbios-sparc64
architecture: sparc:v9, flags 0x0102:
EXEC_P, D_PAGED
start a
On Sunday 15 April 2007 16:03, Blue Swirl wrote:
> On 4/15/07, Stefan Weil <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > The Sparc64 image is much larger than the Sparc32 image,
> > but the size command displays a much smaller text and data size
> > (about the same size as for the Sparc32 image).
> >
> > Maybe it
On 4/15/07, Stefan Weil <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
The Sparc64 image is much larger than the Sparc32 image,
but the size command displays a much smaller text and data size
(about the same size as for the Sparc32 image).
Maybe it contains some unneeded parts?
Thanks for the report. There is ind
The Sparc64 image is much larger than the Sparc32 image,
but the size command displays a much smaller text and data size
(about the same size as for the Sparc32 image).
Maybe it contains some unneeded parts?
Stefan
Blue Swirl schrieb:
> CVSROOT: /cvsroot/qemu
> Module name: qemu
> Changes
CVSROOT:/cvsroot/qemu
Module name:qemu
Changes by: Blue Swirl 07/04/15 06:38:29
Modified files:
pc-bios: README openbios-sparc32
Added files:
pc-bios: openbios-sparc64
Log message:
Update OpenBIOS for Sparc32 and add a Sparc64 image
CVS
20 matches
Mail list logo
