Re: [Qemu-devel] new entry in Qemu forum-- Andre Pech's fix on gdbstub

On Monday 20 February 2006 04:58, Mulyadi Santosa wrote: > Hi... > > On Sunday 19 February 2006 22:39, Paul Brook wrote: > > This patch is not sufficient. > > > > There seems to be some inconsistency whether cpu_get_phys_page_debug > > returns the physical address or the base address of the page. >

Re: Re: [Qemu-devel] new entry in Qemu forum-- Andre Pech's fix on gdbstub

Hi... On Sunday 19 February 2006 22:39, Paul Brook wrote: > This patch is not sufficient. > > There seems to be some inconsistency whether cpu_get_phys_page_debug > returns the physical address or the base address of the page. Hm, I am not so sure either. Anyway, using cscope to find out which f

Re: [Qemu-devel] new entry in Qemu forum-- Andre Pech's fix on gdbstub

On Monday 13 February 2006 05:06, Mulyadi Santosa wrote: > Hi... > > I re-posted the patch by Andre Pech in Qemu forum. The URL is > http://qemu.dad-answers.com/viewtopic.php?p=2809#2809 > > The patch is written to tackle missed breakpoint that sometimes happen. > refer to the related Qemu forum's

[Qemu-devel] new entry in Qemu forum-- Andre Pech's fix on gdbstub

Hi... I re-posted the patch by Andre Pech in Qemu forum. The URL is http://qemu.dad-answers.com/viewtopic.php?p=2809#2809 The patch is written to tackle missed breakpoint that sometimes happen. refer to the related Qemu forum's entry or the original Andre Pech's posting on December 24, 2005 in