On 22/07/15 18:20, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 22, 2015 at 03:40:55PM +0200, Markus Armbruster wrote:
...
>> Deprecating -net except for -net nic sounds like a fine step forward to
>> me.
>
> -net dump is also useful, we'll need some solution for that if we
> want to deprecate vlans.
On Wed, Jul 22, 2015 at 03:40:55PM +0200, Markus Armbruster wrote:
> Copying Andreas just in case.
>
> Thomas Huth writes:
>
> > On 07/17/2015 09:25 AM, Peter Maydell wrote:
> >> On 17 July 2015 at 07:53, Thomas Huth wrote:
> >>> Ok, assuming that my "Network traffic dumping for -netdev devices
Copying Andreas just in case.
Thomas Huth writes:
> On 07/17/2015 09:25 AM, Peter Maydell wrote:
>> On 17 July 2015 at 07:53, Thomas Huth wrote:
>>> Ok, assuming that my "Network traffic dumping for -netdev devices" patch
>>> series is going to solve the dumping-for-netdev problem, how do we
>>
On Fri, Jul 17, 2015 at 08:53:08AM +0200, Thomas Huth wrote:
> On 05/26/2015 04:29 PM, Markus Armbruster wrote:
> > Stefan Hajnoczi writes:
> [...]
> >> We thought the QEMU "vlan" concept would be dropped completely in the
> >> future, so it was never added to -netdev. No patches to do that have
On 07/17/2015 09:25 AM, Peter Maydell wrote:
> On 17 July 2015 at 07:53, Thomas Huth wrote:
>> Ok, assuming that my "Network traffic dumping for -netdev devices" patch
>> series is going to solve the dumping-for-netdev problem, how do we
>> tackle the remaining problems that we have to solve befor
On 17 July 2015 at 07:53, Thomas Huth wrote:
> Ok, assuming that my "Network traffic dumping for -netdev devices" patch
> series is going to solve the dumping-for-netdev problem, how do we
> tackle the remaining problems that we have to solve before we can
> deprecate -net? Does anybody have a sur
On 05/26/2015 04:29 PM, Markus Armbruster wrote:
> Stefan Hajnoczi writes:
[...]
>> We thought the QEMU "vlan" concept would be dropped completely in the
>> future, so it was never added to -netdev. No patches to do that have
>> been posted over the years, so I think it was more of a conceptual g
