On 4 August 2014 12:12, Markus Armbruster wrote:
> I'm afraid we need rip out the problematic patches. Here's Paolo's
> list:
>
> Fabrice Bellard
> 1d6bda356153c82e100680d9f2165e32c8fb1330
> 750afe93fd15fafc20b6c34d30f339547d15c2d1
>
> Jocelyn Mayer
> 75d62a585629cdc1ae0d
Alexey Kardashevskiy writes:
> On 08/04/2014 06:48 PM, Peter Maydell wrote:
>> On 4 August 2014 05:55, Alexey Kardashevskiy wrote:
>>> Our lawyers refused to provide any public advise on this :-/
>>>
>>> Is that it, end of story? :)
>>
>> Well, I 'd still like to get the license fixed to at lea
On 08/04/2014 06:48 PM, Peter Maydell wrote:
> On 4 August 2014 05:55, Alexey Kardashevskiy wrote:
>> Our lawyers refused to provide any public advise on this :-/
>>
>> Is that it, end of story? :)
>
> Well, I 'd still like to get the license fixed to at least my
> personal satisfaction, but if y
On 4 August 2014 05:55, Alexey Kardashevskiy wrote:
> Our lawyers refused to provide any public advise on this :-/
>
> Is that it, end of story? :)
Well, I 'd still like to get the license fixed to at least my
personal satisfaction, but if your lawyers won't confirm
whether what we propose will w
On 06/03/2014 09:42 PM, Peter Maydell wrote:
> On 3 June 2014 12:38, Alexey Kardashevskiy wrote:
>> On 06/03/2014 07:45 PM, Peter Maydell wrote:
>>> On 3 June 2014 04:52, Alexey Kardashevskiy wrote:
Is there anything I can do to help with this? Chase someone down? :)
>>>
>>> Confirming that
On 3 June 2014 12:38, Alexey Kardashevskiy wrote:
> On 06/03/2014 07:45 PM, Peter Maydell wrote:
>> On 3 June 2014 04:52, Alexey Kardashevskiy wrote:
>>> Is there anything I can do to help with this? Chase someone down? :)
>>
>> Confirming that your lawyers are happy with the approach
>> Anthony
On 06/03/2014 07:45 PM, Peter Maydell wrote:
> On 3 June 2014 04:52, Alexey Kardashevskiy wrote:
>> Is there anything I can do to help with this? Chase someone down? :)
>
> Confirming that your lawyers are happy with the approach
> Anthony proposed to take to fixing this would probably
> be usefu
On 3 June 2014 04:52, Alexey Kardashevskiy wrote:
> Is there anything I can do to help with this? Chase someone down? :)
Confirming that your lawyers are happy with the approach
Anthony proposed to take to fixing this would probably
be useful :-)
-- PMM
On 05/21/2014 07:25 PM, Alexander Graf wrote:
>
> On 21.05.14 11:17, Peter Maydell wrote:
>> On 21 May 2014 08:51, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>>> Il 21/05/2014 05:54, Alexey Kardashevskiy ha scritto:
>>>
Hi!
We recently discovered that not entire QEMU is GPL2-compatible, the fpu
emu
Am 21.05.2014 11:47, schrieb Peter Maydell:
> On 21 May 2014 10:43, Markus Armbruster wrote:
>> Alexander Graf writes:
>>> How many % of the overall commits does that make? IIRC you can
>>> relicense source code if the "majority of authors" agrees and nobody
>>> actively disagrees - or so. But IA
On 21 May 2014 10:43, Markus Armbruster wrote:
> Alexander Graf writes:
>> How many % of the overall commits does that make? IIRC you can
>> relicense source code if the "majority of authors" agrees and nobody
>> actively disagrees - or so. But IANAL :)
>
> You can get away with infringing copyri
Alexander Graf writes:
> On 21.05.14 09:51, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>> Il 21/05/2014 05:54, Alexey Kardashevskiy ha scritto:
>>> Hi!
>>>
>>> We recently discovered that not entire QEMU is GPL2-compatible, the fpu
>>> emulation has a different license (copied below) which might create
>>> legal
>>> p
On 21.05.14 11:17, Peter Maydell wrote:
On 21 May 2014 08:51, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
Il 21/05/2014 05:54, Alexey Kardashevskiy ha scritto:
Hi!
We recently discovered that not entire QEMU is GPL2-compatible, the fpu
emulation has a different license (copied below) which might create legal
prob
On 21 May 2014 08:51, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> Il 21/05/2014 05:54, Alexey Kardashevskiy ha scritto:
>
>> Hi!
>>
>> We recently discovered that not entire QEMU is GPL2-compatible, the fpu
>> emulation has a different license (copied below) which might create legal
>> problems because of that "INDEMN
On 05/21/2014 05:51 PM, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> Il 21/05/2014 05:54, Alexey Kardashevskiy ha scritto:
>> Hi!
>>
>> We recently discovered that not entire QEMU is GPL2-compatible, the fpu
>> emulation has a different license (copied below) which might create legal
>> problems because of that "INDEMNI
On 21.05.14 09:51, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
Il 21/05/2014 05:54, Alexey Kardashevskiy ha scritto:
Hi!
We recently discovered that not entire QEMU is GPL2-compatible, the fpu
emulation has a different license (copied below) which might create
legal
problems because of that "INDEMNIFY" statement.
Il 21/05/2014 05:54, Alexey Kardashevskiy ha scritto:
Hi!
We recently discovered that not entire QEMU is GPL2-compatible, the fpu
emulation has a different license (copied below) which might create legal
problems because of that "INDEMNIFY" statement.
Does anyone else care (except IBM)?
What w
Hi!
We recently discovered that not entire QEMU is GPL2-compatible, the fpu
emulation has a different license (copied below) which might create legal
problems because of that "INDEMNIFY" statement.
Does anyone else care (except IBM)?
What would the proper solution be? Ask the creator to relicens
18 matches
Mail list logo
