On 11/17/2011 06:14 PM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
On Thu, Nov 17, 2011 at 09:58:33AM -0600, Adam Litke wrote:
On Thu, Nov 17, 2011 at 03:46:37AM -0500, Ayal Baron wrote:
- Original Message -
I have been following this thread pretty closely and the one sentence
summary of the current
On Thu, 17 Nov 2011 19:09:10 +0200
Barak Azulay wrote:
> On Wednesday 16 November 2011 22:24:51 Adam Litke wrote:
> > I have been following this thread pretty closely and the one sentence
> > summary of the current argument is: ovirt-guest-agent is already
> > featureful and tested, so let's drop
On Wednesday 16 November 2011 22:24:51 Adam Litke wrote:
> I have been following this thread pretty closely and the one sentence
> summary of the current argument is: ovirt-guest-agent is already
> featureful and tested, so let's drop qemu-ga and have everyone adopt
> ovirt-guest-agent.
Not exa
On Thu, Nov 17, 2011 at 11:14 AM, Daniel P. Berrange
wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 17, 2011 at 09:58:33AM -0600, Adam Litke wrote:
>> On Thu, Nov 17, 2011 at 03:46:37AM -0500, Ayal Baron wrote:
>> >
>> >
>> > - Original Message -
>> > > I have been following this thread pretty closely and the one s
On Thu, Nov 17, 2011 at 09:58:33AM -0600, Adam Litke wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 17, 2011 at 03:46:37AM -0500, Ayal Baron wrote:
> >
> >
> > - Original Message -
> > > I have been following this thread pretty closely and the one sentence
> > > summary of the current argument is: ovirt-guest-agen
On Thu, Nov 17, 2011 at 03:46:37AM -0500, Ayal Baron wrote:
>
>
> - Original Message -
> > I have been following this thread pretty closely and the one sentence
> > summary of the current argument is: ovirt-guest-agent is already featureful
> > and tested, so let's drop qemu-ga and have e
On Wed, Nov 16, 2011 at 08:59:35AM -0600, Michael Roth wrote:
> On 11/16/2011 02:16 AM, Ayal Baron wrote:
> >
> >
> >- Original Message -
> >>Hi,
> >>
> >>On 11/15/2011 11:39 PM, Ayal Baron wrote:
> >>>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> If you want to talk about convergence, the discussion should start
On 11/17/2011 02:46 AM, Ayal Baron wrote:
- Original Message -
I have been following this thread pretty closely and the one sentence
summary of
the current argument is: ovirt-guest-agent is already featureful and
tested, so
let's drop qemu-ga and have everyone adopt ovirt-guest-agent.
On 11/17/2011 02:59 AM, Ayal Baron wrote:
- Original Message -
On 11/16/2011 11:53 AM, Barak Azulay wrote:
On Wednesday 16 November 2011 17:28:16 Michael Roth wrote:
2) You'd also need a schema, similar to
qemu.git/qapi-schema-guest.json,
to describe the calls you're proxying. The ex
>>> On 11/16/2011 03:36 PM, Anthony Liguori wrote:
We have another requirement. We need to embed the source for the guest
agent in the QEMU release tarball. This is for GPL compliance since we
want to include an ISO (eventually) that contains binaries.
Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> ovirt-g
On Wed, Nov 16, 2011 at 06:55:06PM +0100, Hans de Goede wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 11/16/2011 02:47 PM, Anthony Liguori wrote:
> >On 11/16/2011 06:07 AM, Alon Levy wrote:
> >>On Wed, Nov 16, 2011 at 08:53:45AM +0100, Hans de Goede wrote:
> >>>Hi,
> >>>
> >>>On 11/15/2011 11:39 PM, Ayal Baron wrote:
> >>>
- Original Message -
> On 11/16/2011 11:53 AM, Barak Azulay wrote:
> > On Wednesday 16 November 2011 17:28:16 Michael Roth wrote:
> >> 2) You'd also need a schema, similar to
> >> qemu.git/qapi-schema-guest.json,
> >> to describe the calls you're proxying. The existing infrastructure
> >>
- Original Message -
> I have been following this thread pretty closely and the one sentence
> summary of
> the current argument is: ovirt-guest-agent is already featureful and
> tested, so
> let's drop qemu-ga and have everyone adopt ovirt-guest-agent.
What we're suggesting is let's dro
On 11/16/2011 04:20 PM, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
...
It can just be a submodule (like we do with SeaBIOS, etc.). The only
request is
that we split guest agent out of vdsm so we don't have to also include
all of
vdsm in the release tarballs. That would make the guest agent an
independent
git repo
On 11/16/2011 02:24 PM, Adam Litke wrote:
I have been following this thread pretty closely and the one sentence summary of
the current argument is: ovirt-guest-agent is already featureful and tested, so
let's drop qemu-ga and have everyone adopt ovirt-guest-agent. Unfortunately,
this track stray
On 11/16/2011 11:53 AM, Barak Azulay wrote:
On Wednesday 16 November 2011 17:28:16 Michael Roth wrote:
2) You'd also need a schema, similar to qemu.git/qapi-schema-guest.json,
to describe the calls you're proxying. The existing infrastructure in
QEMU will handle all the work of marshalling/unmar
On 11/16/2011 11:53 AM, Barak Azulay wrote:
On Wednesday 16 November 2011 17:28:16 Michael Roth wrote:
On 11/16/2011 06:13 AM, Barak Azulay wrote:
On Wednesday 16 November 2011 10:16:57 Alexander Graf wrote:
On 16.11.2011, at 08:05, Barak Azulay wrote:
On Wednesday 16 November 2011 02:42:30
I have been following this thread pretty closely and the one sentence summary of
the current argument is: ovirt-guest-agent is already featureful and tested, so
let's drop qemu-ga and have everyone adopt ovirt-guest-agent. Unfortunately,
this track strays completely away from the stated goal of co
On Wednesday 16 November 2011 17:28:16 Michael Roth wrote:
> On 11/16/2011 06:13 AM, Barak Azulay wrote:
> > On Wednesday 16 November 2011 10:16:57 Alexander Graf wrote:
> >> On 16.11.2011, at 08:05, Barak Azulay wrote:
> >>> On Wednesday 16 November 2011 02:42:30 Alexander Graf wrote:
> On 1
Hi,
On 11/16/2011 02:47 PM, Anthony Liguori wrote:
On 11/16/2011 06:07 AM, Alon Levy wrote:
On Wed, Nov 16, 2011 at 08:53:45AM +0100, Hans de Goede wrote:
Hi,
On 11/15/2011 11:39 PM, Ayal Baron wrote:
If you want to talk about convergence, the discussion should start
around
collecting
On 11/16/2011 06:13 AM, Barak Azulay wrote:
On Wednesday 16 November 2011 10:16:57 Alexander Graf wrote:
On 16.11.2011, at 08:05, Barak Azulay wrote:
On Wednesday 16 November 2011 02:42:30 Alexander Graf wrote:
On 16.11.2011, at 00:01, Michael Roth wrote:
But practically-speaking, it's unavo
On 11/16/2011 02:16 AM, Ayal Baron wrote:
- Original Message -
Hi,
On 11/15/2011 11:39 PM, Ayal Baron wrote:
If you want to talk about convergence, the discussion should start
around
collecting requirements. We can then figure out if the two sets
of
requirements
are strictly o
On 11/16/2011 02:42 PM, Anthony Liguori wrote:
On 11/16/2011 07:39 AM, Dor Laor wrote:
On 11/16/2011 03:36 PM, Anthony Liguori wrote:
We have another requirement. We need to embed the source for the guest
agent in the QEMU release tarball. This is for GPL compliance since we
want to include an
- Original Message -
> On 11/16/2011 07:39 AM, Dor Laor wrote:
> > On 11/16/2011 03:36 PM, Anthony Liguori wrote:
> >> We have another requirement. We need to embed the source for the
> >> guest
> >> agent in the QEMU release tarball. This is for GPL compliance
> >> since we
> >> want to
On 11/16/2011 06:07 AM, Alon Levy wrote:
On Wed, Nov 16, 2011 at 08:53:45AM +0100, Hans de Goede wrote:
Hi,
On 11/15/2011 11:39 PM, Ayal Baron wrote:
If you want to talk about convergence, the discussion should start
around
collecting requirements. We can then figure out if the two sets
On 11/15/2011 04:39 PM, Ayal Baron wrote:
- Original Message -
On 11/15/2011 11:24 AM, Barak Azulay wrote:
Hi,
One of the breakout sessions during the ovirt workshop [1] was
about the guest
tools, and focused mainly on the ovirt-guest-agent [2].
One of the issues discussed there, wa
On 11/16/2011 02:07 PM, Alon Levy wrote:
On Wed, Nov 16, 2011 at 08:53:45AM +0100, Hans de Goede wrote:
Hi,
On 11/15/2011 11:39 PM, Ayal Baron wrote:
If you want to talk about convergence, the discussion should start
around
collecting requirements. We can then figure out if the two sets
On 11/16/2011 07:39 AM, Dor Laor wrote:
On 11/16/2011 03:36 PM, Anthony Liguori wrote:
We have another requirement. We need to embed the source for the guest
agent in the QEMU release tarball. This is for GPL compliance since we
want to include an ISO (eventually) that contains binaries.
This c
On 11/16/2011 03:36 PM, Anthony Liguori wrote:
On 11/15/2011 04:39 PM, Ayal Baron wrote:
If you want to talk about convergence, the discussion should start
around
collecting requirements. We can then figure out if the two sets of
requirements
are strictly overlapping or if there are any requirem
On 11/15/2011 04:39 PM, Ayal Baron wrote:
If you want to talk about convergence, the discussion should start
around
collecting requirements. We can then figure out if the two sets of
requirements
are strictly overlapping or if there are any requirements that are
fundamentally
in opposition.
Ag
On 15/11/2011 19:33, Alon Levy wrote:
Does it have a seperate system level and user level part in Linux? It
No. The ovirt-guest-agent have only one instance running in the system
level.
Gal.
On Wednesday 16 November 2011 10:16:57 Alexander Graf wrote:
> On 16.11.2011, at 08:05, Barak Azulay wrote:
> > On Wednesday 16 November 2011 02:42:30 Alexander Graf wrote:
> >> On 16.11.2011, at 00:01, Michael Roth wrote:
> >>> But practically-speaking, it's unavoidable that qemu-specific
> >>> m
On Wed, Nov 16, 2011 at 08:53:45AM +0100, Hans de Goede wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 11/15/2011 11:39 PM, Ayal Baron wrote:
> >
>
>
>
> >>If you want to talk about convergence, the discussion should start
> >>around
> >>collecting requirements. We can then figure out if the two sets of
> >>requirements
On Tue, Nov 15, 2011 at 05:01:00PM -0600, Michael Roth wrote:
> On 11/15/2011 11:24 AM, Barak Azulay wrote:
> >Hi,
> >
> >One of the breakout sessions during the ovirt workshop [1] was about the
> >guest
> >tools, and focused mainly on the ovirt-guest-agent [2].
> >
> >One of the issues discussed
On 16.11.2011, at 08:05, Barak Azulay wrote:
> On Wednesday 16 November 2011 02:42:30 Alexander Graf wrote:
>> On 16.11.2011, at 00:01, Michael Roth wrote:
>>> But practically-speaking, it's unavoidable that qemu-specific management
>>> tooling will need to communicate with qemu (via QMP/libqmp/
- Original Message -
> Hi,
>
> On 11/15/2011 11:39 PM, Ayal Baron wrote:
> >
>
>
>
> >> If you want to talk about convergence, the discussion should start
> >> around
> >> collecting requirements. We can then figure out if the two sets
> >> of
> >> requirements
> >> are strictly over
Hi,
On 11/15/2011 11:39 PM, Ayal Baron wrote:
If you want to talk about convergence, the discussion should start
around
collecting requirements. We can then figure out if the two sets of
requirements
are strictly overlapping or if there are any requirements that are
fundamentally
in oppos
On Wednesday 16 November 2011 02:42:30 Alexander Graf wrote:
> On 16.11.2011, at 00:01, Michael Roth wrote:
> > But practically-speaking, it's unavoidable that qemu-specific management
> > tooling will need to communicate with qemu (via QMP/libqmp/HMP/etc, or
> > by proxy via libvirt). It's through
On Tuesday 15 November 2011 21:45:42 Perry Myers wrote:
> On 11/15/2011 01:08 PM, Subhendu Ghosh wrote:
> > On 11/15/2011 01:01 PM, Perry Myers wrote:
> >> On 11/15/2011 12:24 PM, Barak Azulay wrote:
> >>> Hi,
> >>>
> >>> One of the breakout sessions during the ovirt workshop [1] was about
> >>> t
On 16.11.2011, at 00:01, Michael Roth wrote:
> But practically-speaking, it's unavoidable that qemu-specific management
> tooling will need to communicate with qemu (via QMP/libqmp/HMP/etc, or by
> proxy via libvirt). It's through those same channels that the qemu-ga
> interfaces will ultimate
On 11/15/2011 11:24 AM, Barak Azulay wrote:
Hi,
One of the breakout sessions during the ovirt workshop [1] was about the guest
tools, and focused mainly on the ovirt-guest-agent [2].
One of the issues discussed there, was the various existing guest agents out
there, and the need to converge the
- Original Message -
> On 11/15/2011 11:24 AM, Barak Azulay wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > One of the breakout sessions during the ovirt workshop [1] was
> > about the guest
> > tools, and focused mainly on the ovirt-guest-agent [2].
> >
> > One of the issues discussed there, was the various exis
On 11/15/2011 01:08 PM, Subhendu Ghosh wrote:
> On 11/15/2011 01:01 PM, Perry Myers wrote:
>> On 11/15/2011 12:24 PM, Barak Azulay wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> One of the breakout sessions during the ovirt workshop [1] was about
>>> the guest
>>> tools, and focused mainly on the ovirt-guest-agent [2].
>>
On 11/15/2011 11:24 AM, Barak Azulay wrote:
Hi,
One of the breakout sessions during the ovirt workshop [1] was about the guest
tools, and focused mainly on the ovirt-guest-agent [2].
One of the issues discussed there, was the various existing guest agents out
there, and the need to converge the
On 11/15/2011 11:24 AM, Barak Azulay wrote:
Hi,
One of the breakout sessions during the ovirt workshop [1] was about the guest
tools, and focused mainly on the ovirt-guest-agent [2].
One of the issues discussed there, was the various existing guest agents out
there, and the need to converge the
On 11/15/2011 01:01 PM, Perry Myers wrote:
On 11/15/2011 12:24 PM, Barak Azulay wrote:
Hi,
One of the breakout sessions during the ovirt workshop [1] was about the guest
tools, and focused mainly on the ovirt-guest-agent [2].
One of the issues discussed there, was the various existing guest ag
On 11/15/2011 12:24 PM, Barak Azulay wrote:
> Hi,
>
> One of the breakout sessions during the ovirt workshop [1] was about the
> guest
> tools, and focused mainly on the ovirt-guest-agent [2].
>
> One of the issues discussed there, was the various existing guest agents out
> there, and the ne
On Tue, Nov 15, 2011 at 07:24:40PM +0200, Barak Azulay wrote:
> Hi,
>
> One of the breakout sessions during the ovirt workshop [1] was about the
> guest
> tools, and focused mainly on the ovirt-guest-agent [2].
>
> One of the issues discussed there, was the various existing guest agents out
>
Hi,
One of the breakout sessions during the ovirt workshop [1] was about the guest
tools, and focused mainly on the ovirt-guest-agent [2].
One of the issues discussed there, was the various existing guest agents out
there, and the need to converge the efforts to a single agent that will serve
49 matches
Mail list logo
