On Fri, 13 Oct 2006, Ben Taylor wrote:
Manually add "-L/usr/local/lib -R/usr/local/lib" to the Makefile for the link
phase so it will correctly add those paths to the library lookup. If I had
a code base to look at this instance, I could tell you where. You could
also add those flags to Make
Ben Taylor wrote:
> Martin Bochnig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>>Ben Taylor wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>> Ishwar Rattan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
Trying to compile qemu on amd64 based Solaris.
I do not have write permission to /usr/local subtree
>
Ben Taylor wrote:
> Ishwar Rattan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>>On Fri, 13 Oct 2006, Martin Bochnig wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>>Ishwar Rattan wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>Where is the problem 64bit versus 32bit ?
>>>(32 bit version of libSDL-1.2.so.0 found while amd64 64bit version needed?)
>>
Ishwar Rattan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> On Fri, 13 Oct 2006, Martin Bochnig wrote:
>
> > Ishwar Rattan wrote:
> >
> >>
> > Where is the problem 64bit versus 32bit ?
> > (32 bit version of libSDL-1.2.so.0 found while amd64 64bit version needed?)
> > (should go under /usr/local/lib/a
Martin Bochnig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Ben Taylor wrote:
>
> > Ishwar Rattan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >
> >>Trying to compile qemu on amd64 based Solaris.
> >>
> >>I do not have write permission to /usr/local subtree
> >>
> >>./configure --libdir=other-path --prefix=not-
Ben Taylor wrote:
> Martin Bochnig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>>Ben Taylor wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>>As Martin indicated, setting LD_LIBRARY_PATH may get you a running
>>>binary, but LD_LIBRARY_PATH is the wrong answer for Solaris.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>My answer had been a bit long
Martin Bochnig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Ben Taylor wrote:
>
> >As Martin indicated, setting LD_LIBRARY_PATH may get you a running
> >binary, but LD_LIBRARY_PATH is the wrong answer for Solaris.
> >
> >
> >
>
> My answer had been a bit longer:
>
> "Read ld.so.1(1)
> i.e.
> # man ld.s
Ben Taylor wrote:
>As Martin indicated, setting LD_LIBRARY_PATH may get you a running
>binary, but LD_LIBRARY_PATH is the wrong answer for Solaris.
>
>
>
My answer had been a bit longer:
"Read ld.so.1(1)
i.e.
# man ld.so.1
Then: *One* option is to set $LD_LIBRARY_PATH (or potentially
$LD_LIBR
Ishwar Rattan wrote:
>
> Also, I downloaded the SDL-1.2.11 source from opensolaris.org download
> page. I can't figure out how to apply the 64bit patch (patch rejects
> the diffs, a visual inspection shows that patch is already applied to the
> source?)
>
> -ishwar
Manually applying a patch wil
On Fri, 13 Oct 2006, Martin Bochnig wrote:
In particular not for 64bit_amd64.
You will hardly be able to meet the required dependencies.
I'm leaving over the weekend now, much luck with it.
Well, the source compiled after LD_LIBRARY_PATH trick with
correct libSDL dependency, ldd shows this
Ben Taylor wrote:
> Ishwar Rattan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>>Trying to compile qemu on amd64 based Solaris.
>>
>>I do not have write permission to /usr/local subtree
>>
>>./configure --libdir=other-path --prefix=not-ustlocal
>>is fine
>>but make always generates binaries that want to
Ishwar Rattan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Trying to compile qemu on amd64 based Solaris.
>
> I do not have write permission to /usr/local subtree
>
> ./configure --libdir=other-path --prefix=not-ustlocal
> is fine
> but make always generates binaries that want to find
> /usr/local/lib/
Ishwar Rattan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Trying to compile qemu on amd64 based Solaris.
>
> I do not have write permission to /usr/local subtree
>
> ./configure --libdir=other-path --prefix=not-ustlocal
> is fine
> but make always generates binaries that want to find
> /usr/local/lib/
Ishwar Rattan wrote:
>
>
> On Fri, 13 Oct 2006, Martin Bochnig wrote:
>
>> Ishwar Rattan wrote:
>>
>>>
>> Where is the problem 64bit versus 32bit ?
>> (32 bit version of libSDL-1.2.so.0 found while amd64 64bit version
>> needed?)
>> (should go under /usr/local/lib/amd64/libSDL-1.2.so.0)
>
> Well,
On Fri, 13 Oct 2006, Martin Bochnig wrote:
Ishwar Rattan wrote:
Where is the problem 64bit versus 32bit ?
(32 bit version of libSDL-1.2.so.0 found while amd64 64bit version needed?)
(should go under /usr/local/lib/amd64/libSDL-1.2.so.0)
Well, the problem is I do not root privileges so can
Ishwar Rattan wrote:
>
> Trying to compile qemu on amd64 based Solaris.
>
> I do not have write permission to /usr/local subtree
>
> ./configure --libdir=other-path --prefix=not-ustlocal
> is fine
> but make always generates binaries that want to find
> /usr/local/lib/libSDL-1.2.so.0 etc. (checked
Trying to compile qemu on amd64 based Solaris.
I do not have write permission to /usr/local subtree
./configure --libdir=other-path --prefix=not-ustlocal
is fine
but make always generates binaries that want to find
/usr/local/lib/libSDL-1.2.so.0 etc. (checked with ldd).
What is the way out for
17 matches
Mail list logo
