On Wed, Oct 05, 2016 at 10:12:57AM +0200, Kevin Wolf wrote:
> Am 04.10.2016 um 18:02 hat Stefan Hajnoczi geschrieben:
> > On Tue, Oct 04, 2016 at 01:55:30PM +0200, Kevin Wolf wrote:
> > > Am 04.10.2016 um 12:41 hat Denis V. Lunev geschrieben:
> > > > On 10/04/2016 12:34 PM, Kevin Wolf wrote:
> > >
Am 04.10.2016 um 18:02 hat Stefan Hajnoczi geschrieben:
> On Tue, Oct 04, 2016 at 01:55:30PM +0200, Kevin Wolf wrote:
> > Am 04.10.2016 um 12:41 hat Denis V. Lunev geschrieben:
> > > On 10/04/2016 12:34 PM, Kevin Wolf wrote:
> > > > Am 04.10.2016 um 11:23 hat Stefan Hajnoczi geschrieben:
> > > >> O
On 10/04/2016 07:03 PM, John Snow wrote:
>
>
> On 10/04/2016 12:02 PM, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
>> On Tue, Oct 04, 2016 at 01:55:30PM +0200, Kevin Wolf wrote:
>>> Am 04.10.2016 um 12:41 hat Denis V. Lunev geschrieben:
On 10/04/2016 12:34 PM, Kevin Wolf wrote:
> Am 04.10.2016 um 11:23 hat Ste
On Tue, Oct 04, 2016 at 01:55:30PM +0200, Kevin Wolf wrote:
> Am 04.10.2016 um 12:41 hat Denis V. Lunev geschrieben:
> > On 10/04/2016 12:34 PM, Kevin Wolf wrote:
> > > Am 04.10.2016 um 11:23 hat Stefan Hajnoczi geschrieben:
> > >> On Mon, Oct 03, 2016 at 02:07:34PM -0400, John Snow wrote:
> > >>>
On 10/04/2016 12:02 PM, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
On Tue, Oct 04, 2016 at 01:55:30PM +0200, Kevin Wolf wrote:
Am 04.10.2016 um 12:41 hat Denis V. Lunev geschrieben:
On 10/04/2016 12:34 PM, Kevin Wolf wrote:
Am 04.10.2016 um 11:23 hat Stefan Hajnoczi geschrieben:
On Mon, Oct 03, 2016 at 02:07:3
On 10/04/2016 12:34 PM, Kevin Wolf wrote:
> Am 04.10.2016 um 11:23 hat Stefan Hajnoczi geschrieben:
>> On Mon, Oct 03, 2016 at 02:07:34PM -0400, John Snow wrote:
>>>
>>> On 10/03/2016 09:11 AM, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
On Fri, Sep 30, 2016 at 09:59:16PM +0300, Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
Am 04.10.2016 um 12:41 hat Denis V. Lunev geschrieben:
> On 10/04/2016 12:34 PM, Kevin Wolf wrote:
> > Am 04.10.2016 um 11:23 hat Stefan Hajnoczi geschrieben:
> >> On Mon, Oct 03, 2016 at 02:07:34PM -0400, John Snow wrote:
> >>>
> >>> On 10/03/2016 09:11 AM, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
> On Fri, Se
Am 04.10.2016 um 11:23 hat Stefan Hajnoczi geschrieben:
> On Mon, Oct 03, 2016 at 02:07:34PM -0400, John Snow wrote:
> >
> >
> > On 10/03/2016 09:11 AM, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
> > > On Fri, Sep 30, 2016 at 09:59:16PM +0300, Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
> > > wrote:
> > > > On 30.09.2016 20:11, V
On Mon, Oct 03, 2016 at 02:07:34PM -0400, John Snow wrote:
>
>
> On 10/03/2016 09:11 AM, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
> > On Fri, Sep 30, 2016 at 09:59:16PM +0300, Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
> > wrote:
> > > On 30.09.2016 20:11, Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy wrote:
> > > > Hi all!
> > > >
> > > > Pl
On 10/03/2016 09:11 AM, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
On Fri, Sep 30, 2016 at 09:59:16PM +0300, Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy wrote:
On 30.09.2016 20:11, Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy wrote:
Hi all!
Please, can somebody explain me, why we fail guest request in case of io
error in write notifier? I th
On Fri, Sep 30, 2016 at 09:59:16PM +0300, Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy wrote:
> On 30.09.2016 20:11, Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy wrote:
> > Hi all!
> >
> > Please, can somebody explain me, why we fail guest request in case of io
> > error in write notifier? I think guest consistency is more impor
On 30.09.2016 20:11, Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy wrote:
Hi all!
Please, can somebody explain me, why we fail guest request in case of
io error in write notifier? I think guest consistency is more
important than success of unfinished backup. Or, what am I missing?
I'm saying about this code:
Hi all!
Please, can somebody explain me, why we fail guest request in case of io
error in write notifier? I think guest consistency is more important
than success of unfinished backup. Or, what am I missing?
I'm saying about this code:
static int coroutine_fn backup_before_write_notify(
13 matches
Mail list logo