On 12/14/2009 02:03 PM, Paul Brook wrote:
[3] Obviously if you emulate lame hardware like ne2k or IDE then
performance
will suck. However emulation of a high-end NIC of SCSI HBA should get within
spitting distance of virtio.
Practically the only difference performance-wise between virtio a
On Sun, 13 Dec 2009, Mark Williamson wrote:
> There may be an option c) in existence. The OpenTC project (EU funded)
> included a secure UI project and part of that involved a prototype
> paravirtualised 3D driver. It was done primarily by a research assistant at
> Cambridge University Compute
On Saturday 12 December 2009, Dave Airlie wrote:
> So I've been musing on the addition of some sort of 3D passthrough for
> qemu (as I'm sure have lots of ppl)
IIUC a typical graphics system consists of several operations:
1) Allocate space for data objects[2] on server[1].
2) Upload data from cl
On Saturday 12 December 2009 01:58:02 Dave Airlie wrote:
> So I've been musing on the addition of some sort of 3D passthrough for
> qemu (as I'm sure have lots of ppl)
>
> But I think the goals of such an addition need to be discussed prior
> to anyone writing a line of code.
>
> Current existing
So I've been musing on the addition of some sort of 3D passthrough for
qemu (as I'm sure have lots of ppl)
But I think the goals of such an addition need to be discussed prior
to anyone writing a line of code.
Current existing solutions in the area:
a) VMware virtual graphics adapter - based on D
