On Tuesday 16 January 2007 15:12, Ottavio Caruso wrote:
> --- Oliver Gerlich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > as I was just reading this on german newsticker heise.de:
> > http://www.heise.de/open/news/meldung/83680
> >
> > Also on Slashdot:
> > http://it.slashdot.org/it/07/01/15/1631234.shtml
> >
>
--- Oliver Gerlich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> as I was just reading this on german newsticker heise.de:
> http://www.heise.de/open/news/meldung/83680
>
> Also on Slashdot:
> http://it.slashdot.org/it/07/01/15/1631234.shtml
>
> And the original news:
> http://www.virtualbox.org/wiki/News
>
--- Ottavio Caruso <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Interesting! Does anybody know if and where I could finf [sic!]a
Windows
> binary via http/ftp? Unfortunately I can't torrent!
I am sorry! A Windows binary was actually provided and I have later
installed it, but I am not going touse it as it is n
On Tuesday 16 January 2007 08:25, Christian MICHON wrote:
> based on *quick* benchs and without entering too much in detail
> (in case I'd violate EULA), it seems faster than qemu+kqemu on
> windows hosts :(
Why is that a bad thing? VirtualBox is GPL, kqemu is not, so I'd say
VirtualBox being fas
sorry I meant " :) "
it's a stupid typo mistake...
basically: video is faster, hdd access is faster.
I'll see if I can gather more figures.
I hope too we can put these improvements back inside qemu
of course! :)
On 1/16/07, Paul Brook <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Tuesday 16 January 2007 08:2
based on *quick* benchs and without entering too much in detail
(in case I'd violate EULA), it seems faster than qemu+kqemu on
windows hosts :(
--
Christian
___
Qemu-devel mailing list
Qemu-devel@nongnu.org
http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qem
On Mon, Jan 15, 2007 at 11:29:41PM +0100, Oliver Gerlich wrote:
> It seems like VB doesn't use something like -kernel-kqemu; during Ubuntu
> boot, host CPU was only used by userland apps, while with Qemu with
> -kernel-kqemu 80% of host CPU was used by kernel.
According to http://www.virtualbox.o
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Oliver Gerlich schrieb:
> Hello,
>
> as I was just reading this on german newsticker heise.de:
> http://www.heise.de/open/news/meldung/83680
>
> Also on Slashdot:
> http://it.slashdot.org/it/07/01/15/1631234.shtml
>
> And the original news:
> http:/
What I don't see (and I hope they would answer) are any patches for
QEMU which fixes things like installation of XP (the famous freeze),
Vista, etc..
Anyone from InnoTek (I assume they're on the mailing list ) care to
shed some light about patches, availability etc please?
Thanks,
Hetz
On 1/15/
On Monday 15 January 2007 20:02, Oliver Gerlich wrote:
> Hello,
>
> as I was just reading this on german newsticker heise.de:
> http://www.heise.de/open/news/meldung/83680
>
> Also on Slashdot:
> http://it.slashdot.org/it/07/01/15/1631234.shtml
>
> And the original news:
> http://www.virtualbox.org
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello,
as I was just reading this on german newsticker heise.de:
http://www.heise.de/open/news/meldung/83680
Also on Slashdot:
http://it.slashdot.org/it/07/01/15/1631234.shtml
And the original news:
http://www.virtualbox.org/wiki/News
Anyone knows
11 matches
Mail list logo
