On 21 oct. 05, at 22:16, Steven wrote:
Hi all,
Looking at qemu, it seems as if it could be possible to allow it to
run Intel OS X apps on PowerPC OS X, much like a reverse Rosetta. The
x86 frameworks/libraries are included with Xcode, so possibly
everything else could run natively, just have th
Yes I think this would be useful because there are situations where
developers do not create universal binaries. This is most apparent
with the host of applications being ported to Mac OS X on Intel that
aren't compiled using GCC4 and are therefore Intel-only.
And also, it might help future-proof
> (1) I believe there is an m68k target being worked on, which is not
> strictly linux only. I haven't looked at it very closely and am not sure of
> the details. But this doesn't really help you anyways.
The m68k target supports a very simple semihosting syscall layer, similar to
the the "angel"
Am 21.10.2005 um 22:16 schrieb Steven:
Hi all,
Looking at qemu, it seems as if it could be possible to allow it to
run Intel OS X apps on PowerPC OS X, much like a reverse Rosetta. The
x86 frameworks/libraries are included with Xcode, so possibly
everything else could run natively, just have t
On Fri, Oct 21, 2005 at 09:16:18PM +0100, Steven wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Looking at qemu, it seems as if it could be possible to allow it to
> run Intel OS X apps on PowerPC OS X, much like a reverse Rosetta. The
> x86 frameworks/libraries are included with Xcode, so possibly
> everything else could
Hi all,
Looking at qemu, it seems as if it could be possible to allow it to
run Intel OS X apps on PowerPC OS X, much like a reverse Rosetta. The
x86 frameworks/libraries are included with Xcode, so possibly
everything else could run natively, just have the app itself emulated.
Is anybody willing
