On 02/03/12 18:41, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
On Fri, Mar 02, 2012 at 02:25:36PM +0400, Michael Tokarev wrote:
Not a reply to the patch but a general observation.
I noticed that the tcp migration uses gethostname
(or getaddrinfo after this patch) from the main
thread - is it really the way to go
On Fri, Mar 02, 2012 at 02:25:36PM +0400, Michael Tokarev wrote:
> Not a reply to the patch but a general observation.
>
> I noticed that the tcp migration uses gethostname
> (or getaddrinfo after this patch) from the main
> thread - is it really the way to go? Note that
> DNS query which is done
Not a reply to the patch but a general observation.
I noticed that the tcp migration uses gethostname
(or getaddrinfo after this patch) from the main
thread - is it really the way to go? Note that
DNS query which is done may block for a large amount
of time. Is it really safe in this context? S
