On 21/09/11 5:21 AM, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
On 09/21/2011 09:43 AM, Brad wrote:
It is not portable code, and (unlike the rest of qemu-nbd and the
block/nbd.c protocol) not meant to be portable. Are BLKROSET (defined in
linux/fs.h) and the whole set of NBD ioctls available under OpenBSD?
Ok. What
On 09/21/2011 09:43 AM, Brad wrote:
>> It is not portable code, and (unlike the rest of qemu-nbd and the
>> block/nbd.c protocol) not meant to be portable. Are BLKROSET (defined in
>> linux/fs.h) and the whole set of NBD ioctls available under OpenBSD?
>
> Ok. What confused me a bit is that partic
On 21/09/11 3:32 AM, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
On 09/21/2011 09:27 AM, Brad wrote:
Besides the obvious issue..
nbd.c:443: error: conflicting types for 'nbd_init'
nbd.h:71: error: previous declaration of 'nbd_init' was here
Oops, thanks for pointing it out to me.
The changing of #ifndef _WIN32 to
Am 21.09.2011 09:32, schrieb Paolo Bonzini:
> On 09/21/2011 09:27 AM, Brad wrote:
>> Besides the obvious issue..
>>
>> nbd.c:443: error: conflicting types for 'nbd_init'
>> nbd.h:71: error: previous declaration of 'nbd_init' was here
>
> Oops, thanks for pointing it out to me.
Can you please send
On 09/21/2011 09:27 AM, Brad wrote:
Besides the obvious issue..
nbd.c:443: error: conflicting types for 'nbd_init'
nbd.h:71: error: previous declaration of 'nbd_init' was here
Oops, thanks for pointing it out to me.
The changing of #ifndef _WIN32 to #ifdef __linux__ in nbd.c also
looks quest
The following commit..
nbd: support feature negotiation
nbd supports writing flags in bytes 24...27 of the header,
and uses that for the read-only flag. Add support for it
in qemu-nbd.
breaks the tree on what looks like anything but Linux.
Besides the obvious issue..
nbd.c:443: error: confli
