On (Wed) Jan 13 2010 [12:32:54], Amit Shah wrote:
> >
> > I'd be very interested in the results of Sparc32 and Sparc64 analyses.
>
> OK, I added the two targets to the run and got the following result:
>
> http://amitshah.fedorapeople.org/clang-output/2010-01-13-1/
>
> The bug count went up fro
On Thu, Jan 14, 2010 at 3:09 AM, Amit Shah wrote:
> On (Wed) Jan 13 2010 [19:08:11], Blue Swirl wrote:
>>
>> Thanks. I fixed the warnings related to Sparc32. Were there really no
>> new warnings for Sparc64?
>
> Looks like it; vl.c gets reported three times at the same locations so 3
> arches have
On (Wed) Jan 13 2010 [19:08:11], Blue Swirl wrote:
>
> Thanks. I fixed the warnings related to Sparc32. Were there really no
> new warnings for Sparc64?
Looks like it; vl.c gets reported three times at the same locations so 3
arches have been compiled.
My test machine is down ATM, I can confirm
On Wed, Jan 13, 2010 at 7:02 AM, Amit Shah wrote:
> On (Tue) Jan 12 2010 [19:35:08], Blue Swirl wrote:
>> On Tue, Jan 12, 2010 at 6:13 PM, Amit Shah wrote:
>> > Hello,
>> >
>> > Here's a run of the clang analyzer on qemu sources for the x86_64
>> > target.
>> >
>> > See
>> >
>> > http://amitshah.
On (Tue) Jan 12 2010 [22:01:15], malc wrote:
>
> Both audio.c issues are wrong, dma/sb16 is of useless operation variety
> nevertheless the "fix" is pushed, hopefuly clang shouldn't complain about
> them anymore.
Yes, the count went down to 95 from 98 after your commits.
There are a few false po
On (Tue) Jan 12 2010 [19:35:08], Blue Swirl wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 12, 2010 at 6:13 PM, Amit Shah wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > Here's a run of the clang analyzer on qemu sources for the x86_64
> > target.
> >
> > See
> >
> > http://amitshah.fedorapeople.org/clang-output/2010-01-12-9/
> >
> > for the re
On Tue, Jan 12, 2010 at 6:13 PM, Amit Shah wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Here's a run of the clang analyzer on qemu sources for the x86_64
> target.
>
> See
>
> http://amitshah.fedorapeople.org/clang-output/2010-01-12-9/
>
> for the results.
>
> There are a few results there which look dubious but a lot of
On Tue, 12 Jan 2010, Amit Shah wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Here's a run of the clang analyzer on qemu sources for the x86_64
> target.
>
> See
>
> http://amitshah.fedorapeople.org/clang-output/2010-01-12-9/
>
> for the results.
>
> There are a few results there which look dubious but a lot of the out
Hello,
Here's a run of the clang analyzer on qemu sources for the x86_64
target.
See
http://amitshah.fedorapeople.org/clang-output/2010-01-12-9/
for the results.
There are a few results there which look dubious but a lot of the output
can be useful to fix the bugs.
What's nice about the tool
