On Sunday 11 November 2007, Blue Swirl wrote:
> On 11/11/07, Paul Brook <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > The attached patch starts splitting vl.h up a bit.
>
> I understand Fabrice's concern about small files, but I think this is
> the right direction.
Ok, I'll try to keep them to a minimum. e.g. I
On 11/11/07, Paul Brook <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The attached patch starts splitting vl.h up a bit.
> I've pulled out the i2c, disk and irq code.
>
> Because I picked some of the easier ones, they can also be built once, rather
> than for every target.
>
> Obviously there's a lot left to do, bu
The attached patch starts splitting vl.h up a bit.
I've pulled out the i2c, disk and irq code.
Because I picked some of the easier ones, they can also be built once, rather
than for every target.
Obviously there's a lot left to do, but my grand plan is to get rid of vl.h
altogether. A few file
