Blue Swirl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 5/29/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Tue, May 29, 2007 at 09:44:39PM +0300, Blue Swirl wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > I found a bug in the subpage checking code. Could you try if the
> > > attached patch fixes the problem?
> >
On Tue, May 29, 2007 at 10:33:37PM +0300, Blue Swirl wrote:
> On 5/29/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >On Tue, May 29, 2007 at 09:44:39PM +0300, Blue Swirl wrote:
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> I found a bug in the subpage checking code. Could you try if the
> >> attached patch fixes the pro
On 5/29/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Tue, May 29, 2007 at 09:44:39PM +0300, Blue Swirl wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I found a bug in the subpage checking code. Could you try if the
> attached patch fixes the problem?
thats a negative. the exact same behavior as before.
Thanks.
The
On Tue, May 29, 2007 at 09:44:39PM +0300, Blue Swirl wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I found a bug in the subpage checking code. Could you try if the
> attached patch fixes the problem?
thats a negative. the exact same behavior as before.
qemu: fatal: Trying to execute code outside RAM or ROM at 0xfff0
EA
Hi,
I found a bug in the subpage checking code. Could you try if the
attached patch fixes the problem?
Index: qemu/exec.c
===
--- qemu.orig/exec.c 2007-05-29 18:39:35.0 +
+++ qemu/exec.c 2007-05-29 18:39:54.0 +000
On 5/29/07, Ben Taylor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Looks like the patch from
http://cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/qemu/exec.c?cvsroot=qemu&r1=1.96&r2=1.97
needs to be reverted and reworked before being recommitted.
Thank you for the reports. I still can't reproduce the bug, but it
seems that on
Hi Julia,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On Tue, May 29, 2007 at 01:10:02AM -0400, Ben Taylor wrote:
> >
> > I've been keeping up with CVS patches for qemu about once a week. I just
> > updated
> > tonight after the big round of patches that have been commited and am
> > seeing a
> > consist
On Tue, May 29, 2007 at 01:10:02AM -0400, Ben Taylor wrote:
>
> I've been keeping up with CVS patches for qemu about once a week. I just
> updated
> tonight after the big round of patches that have been commited and am seeing a
> consistent failure with my existing ubuntu-7.04 32-bit guest on So
Hi,
I do reproduce that trying to boot a kubuntu i386 on an i368.
Now we have to bisect...
Xavier.
I've been keeping up with CVS patches for qemu about once a week. I just
updated
tonight after the big round of patches that have been commited and am seeing a
consistent failure with my exist
I've been keeping up with CVS patches for qemu about once a week. I just
updated
tonight after the big round of patches that have been commited and am seeing a
consistent failure with my existing ubuntu-7.04 32-bit guest on Solaris 10/x86
32-bit
host. The last time I tested the CVS code would
10 matches
Mail list logo
