Hi,
On Saturday 17 March 2007 10:51, Johannes Schindelin wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Sat, 17 Mar 2007, axel wrote:
> > Why there exist two different blocks for COFF and ELF for x86/x86_64
> > hosts?
>
> Because COFF is used by Windows, and ELF by Linux, and they are
> substantially different?
>
Sorry, I d
Hi,
On Sat, 17 Mar 2007, axel wrote:
> Why there exist two different blocks for COFF and ELF for x86/x86_64
> hosts?
Because COFF is used by Windows, and ELF by Linux, and they are
substantially different?
> @@ -1458,6 +1458,8 @@
> error("empty code for %s", name);
> if
On Friday 16 March 2007 20:30, Igor Kovalenko wrote:
> On 3/16/07, Julian Seward <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I'm seeing redundant repz (0xF3) prefixes in generated code, typically
> > just before jumps:
> >
> > : repz mov $0xe07f,%eax
> > : mov%eax,0x20(%rbp)
> > : lea-25168302(%rip),
> ifeq ($(ARCH),x86_64)
> +OP_CFLAGS+= -mtune=nocona -W -Wall -O4
> BASE_LDFLAGS+=-Wl,-T,$(SRC_PATH)/$(ARCH).ld
> endif
That works. Thanks.
J
___
Qemu-devel mailing list
Qemu-devel@nongnu.org
http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel
On 3/16/07, Julian Seward <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I'm seeing redundant repz (0xF3) prefixes in generated code, typically
just before jumps:
: repz mov $0xe07f,%eax
: mov%eax,0x20(%rbp)
: lea-25168302(%rip),%ebx # 0xaf0420
: retq
: mov-25168245(%rip),%eax # 0xaf0460
: jm
> > 8b50 :
> > 8b50: 8b 05 00 00 00 00 mov0(%rip),%eax
> > 8b52: R_X86_64_PC32 __op_param1+0x3c
> > 8b56: ff e0 jmpq *%rax
> > 8b58: f3 c3 repz retq
> >
> > qemu only strips the fin
On Friday 16 March 2007 14:28, Paul Brook wrote:
> On Friday 16 March 2007 14:15, Julian Seward wrote:
> > I'm seeing redundant repz (0xF3) prefixes in generated code, typically
> > just before jumps:
> >
> > : repz mov $0xe07f,%eax
> > : mov%eax,0x20(%rbp)
> > : lea-25168302(%rip),%ebx
On Friday 16 March 2007 14:15, Julian Seward wrote:
> I'm seeing redundant repz (0xF3) prefixes in generated code, typically
> just before jumps:
>
> : repz mov $0xe07f,%eax
> : mov%eax,0x20(%rbp)
> : lea-25168302(%rip),%ebx # 0xaf0420
> : retq
> : mov-25168245(%rip),%eax # 0xaf
I'm seeing redundant repz (0xF3) prefixes in generated code, typically
just before jumps:
: repz mov $0xe07f,%eax
: mov%eax,0x20(%rbp)
: lea-25168302(%rip),%ebx # 0xaf0420
: retq
: mov-25168245(%rip),%eax # 0xaf0460
: jmpq *%rax
: repz mov $0xe092,%eax
: mov%eax,0x20
