* Blue Swirl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [070720 15:11]:
> > Unaligned accesses should be done with unaligned-l@ ( addr -- quad )
> > instead of [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> > So either the pointer was calculated wrong or Solaris does not care
> > about alignment in l@
> >
> > If you change it, please make the
* Blue Swirl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [070719 20:46]:
> On 7/19/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Unhandled Exception 0x0007
> > PC = 0xffd0a55c NPC = 0xffd09374
> > Stopping execution
> >
> > So this is my report, I hope it can be of some use. I'll try to boot sparc
> > ve
I just want to report, that today I tried to launch debian 3.1 r2 sparc
net install CD for both the stable 0.9.0 and the last CVS snapshot.
While stable threw an error at me, CVS snapshot booted debian nicely and
installed on disk image. It even discovered internet access by DHCP, so
there is a
> Maybe write_long should handle unaligned addresses?
Possibly. But something is wrong.
Unaligned accesses should be done with unaligned-l@ ( addr -- quad )
instead of [EMAIL PROTECTED]
So either the pointer was calculated wrong or Solaris does not care
about alignment in l@
If you change it,
On 7/19/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Unhandled Exception 0x0007
PC = 0xffd0a55c NPC = 0xffd09374
Stopping execution
So this is my report, I hope it can be of some use. I'll try to boot sparc
version of OpenSolaris soon and I'l let you know how it went.
Thanks for
Am 19.07.2007 um 17:58 schrieb Jonathan Kalbfeld:
if you can get the kernel to load and tell you that you need 64-
bit, that's probably progress.
When booting Solaris 10 some while ago it did tell me that without
such exception. Will check if a regression was introduced.
Andreas
OpenSolaris requires sparcv9, so it's unlikely that the OS will boot using
qemu-system-sparc. However, if you can get the kernel to load and tell you
that you need 64-bit, that's probably progress.
jonathan
On 7/19/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
As promised, I tried today to
