Re: [Qemu-devel] Re: Two QMP events issues

2010-02-09 Thread Jamie Lokier
Daniel P. Berrange wrote: > For further backgrou, the key end goal here is that in a QMP client, upon > receipt of the 'RESET' event, we need to reliably & immediately determine > why it occurred. eg, triggered by watchdog, or by guest OS request. There > are actually 3 possible sequences Note t

Re: [Qemu-devel] Re: Two QMP events issues

2010-02-09 Thread Jamie Lokier
Daniel P. Berrange wrote: > For further backgrou, the key end goal here is that in a QMP client, upon > receipt of the 'RESET' event, we need to reliably & immediately determine > why it occurred. eg, triggered by watchdog, or by guest OS request. There > are actually 3 possible sequences > > -

Re: [Qemu-devel] Re: Two QMP events issues

2010-02-08 Thread Anthony Liguori
On 02/08/2010 01:59 PM, Luiz Capitulino wrote: Looks reasonable to me, what do think Daniel? Note that if we agree on the 'context design', I'll have to change VNC's events names.. Let me give you a few suggestions before diving into it. context might not be the best name. For eve

Re: [Qemu-devel] Re: Two QMP events issues

2010-02-08 Thread Luiz Capitulino
On Mon, 08 Feb 2010 13:14:24 -0600 Anthony Liguori wrote: > On 02/08/2010 12:25 PM, Luiz Capitulino wrote: > > On Mon, 08 Feb 2010 09:13:37 -0600 > > Anthony Liguori wrote: > > > > > >> On 02/08/2010 08:56 AM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote: > >> > >>> On Mon, Feb 08, 2010 at 08:49:20AM -060

Re: [Qemu-devel] Re: Two QMP events issues

2010-02-08 Thread Anthony Liguori
On 02/08/2010 12:25 PM, Luiz Capitulino wrote: On Mon, 08 Feb 2010 09:13:37 -0600 Anthony Liguori wrote: On 02/08/2010 08:56 AM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote: On Mon, Feb 08, 2010 at 08:49:20AM -0600, Anthony Liguori wrote: On 02/08/2010 08:12 AM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:

Re: [Qemu-devel] Re: Two QMP events issues

2010-02-08 Thread Luiz Capitulino
On Mon, 08 Feb 2010 09:13:37 -0600 Anthony Liguori wrote: > On 02/08/2010 08:56 AM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote: > > On Mon, Feb 08, 2010 at 08:49:20AM -0600, Anthony Liguori wrote: > > > >> On 02/08/2010 08:12 AM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote: > >> > >>> For further backgrou, the key end goal

[Qemu-devel] Re: Two QMP events issues

2010-02-08 Thread Luiz Capitulino
On Mon, 8 Feb 2010 14:12:20 + "Daniel P. Berrange" wrote: > On Mon, Feb 08, 2010 at 11:41:45AM -0200, Luiz Capitulino wrote: > > > > Hi there, > > > > I have two not so related QMP events issues two discuss, but I will talk > > about > > them in the same email to avoid starting two threa

Re: [Qemu-devel] Re: Two QMP events issues

2010-02-08 Thread Anthony Liguori
On 02/08/2010 08:56 AM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote: On Mon, Feb 08, 2010 at 08:49:20AM -0600, Anthony Liguori wrote: On 02/08/2010 08:12 AM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote: For further backgrou, the key end goal here is that in a QMP client, upon receipt of the 'RESET' event, we need to reli

Re: [Qemu-devel] Re: Two QMP events issues

2010-02-08 Thread Daniel P. Berrange
On Mon, Feb 08, 2010 at 08:49:20AM -0600, Anthony Liguori wrote: > On 02/08/2010 08:12 AM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote: > > > >For further backgrou, the key end goal here is that in a QMP client, upon > >receipt of the 'RESET' event, we need to reliably& immediately determine > >why it occurred. eg

Re: [Qemu-devel] Re: Two QMP events issues

2010-02-08 Thread Anthony Liguori
On 02/08/2010 08:12 AM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote: For further backgrou, the key end goal here is that in a QMP client, upon receipt of the 'RESET' event, we need to reliably& immediately determine why it occurred. eg, triggered by watchdog, or by guest OS request. There are actually 3 possibl

[Qemu-devel] Re: Two QMP events issues

2010-02-08 Thread Daniel P. Berrange
On Mon, Feb 08, 2010 at 11:41:45AM -0200, Luiz Capitulino wrote: > > Hi there, > > I have two not so related QMP events issues two discuss, but I will talk > about > them in the same email to avoid starting two threads. > > The first problem is wrt the STOP event. Right now it's only emitted