On 10/20/2010 04:18 AM, Kevin Wolf wrote:
Am 19.10.2010 19:09, schrieb Anthony Liguori:
On 10/19/2010 11:54 AM, Ayal Baron wrote:
- "Anthony Liguori" wrote:
On 10/19/2010 07:48 AM, Dor Laor wrote:
On 10/19/2010 04:11 AM, Chris Wright wrote:
*
- "Kevin Wolf" wrote:
> Am 19.10.2010 19:09, schrieb Anthony Liguori:
> > On 10/19/2010 11:54 AM, Ayal Baron wrote:
> >> - "Anthony Liguori" wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >>> On 10/19/2010 07:48 AM, Dor Laor wrote:
> >>>
> On 10/19/2010 04:11 AM, Chris Wright wrote:
>
>
Am 19.10.2010 19:09, schrieb Anthony Liguori:
> On 10/19/2010 11:54 AM, Ayal Baron wrote:
>> - "Anthony Liguori" wrote:
>>
>>
>>> On 10/19/2010 07:48 AM, Dor Laor wrote:
>>>
On 10/19/2010 04:11 AM, Chris Wright wrote:
> * Juan Quintela (quint...@redhat.com) wrot
On 10/19/2010 03:57 PM, Ayal Baron wrote:
Yeah, concurrent is a little trickier. Simple solution is for a
management tool to just do a stop + multiple snapshots + cont. It's
equivalent to what we'd do if we don't do it aio which is probably how
we'd do the first implementation.
But in the lon
- "Anthony Liguori" wrote:
> On 10/19/2010 11:54 AM, Ayal Baron wrote:
> > - "Anthony Liguori" wrote:
> >
> >
> >> On 10/19/2010 07:48 AM, Dor Laor wrote:
> >>
> >>> On 10/19/2010 04:11 AM, Chris Wright wrote:
> >>>
> * Juan Quintela (quint...@redhat.com) wrote:
>
On 10/19/2010 11:54 AM, Ayal Baron wrote:
- "Anthony Liguori" wrote:
On 10/19/2010 07:48 AM, Dor Laor wrote:
On 10/19/2010 04:11 AM, Chris Wright wrote:
* Juan Quintela (quint...@redhat.com) wrote:
Please send in any agenda items you are interested in coverin
- "Anthony Liguori" wrote:
> On 10/19/2010 07:48 AM, Dor Laor wrote:
> > On 10/19/2010 04:11 AM, Chris Wright wrote:
> >> * Juan Quintela (quint...@redhat.com) wrote:
> >>>
> >>> Please send in any agenda items you are interested in covering.
> >>
> >> - 0.13.X -stable handoff
> >> - 0.14 pl
On 10/19/2010 03:38 PM, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
bdrv_aio_freeze() or any mechanism to deal with pending requests in
the generic block code would be a good step for future "live" support
of other operations like truncate.
+ logical disk grow, etc.
--
error compiling committee.c: too many argume
On 10/19/2010 08:27 AM, Avi Kivity wrote:
On 10/19/2010 03:22 PM, Anthony Liguori wrote:
I had assumed that this would involve:
qemu -hda windows.img
(qemu) snapshot ide0-disk0 snap0.img
1) create snap0.img internally by doing the equivalent of `qemu-img
create -f qcow2 -b windows.img snap
On 10/19/2010 02:58 PM, Dor Laor wrote:
On 10/19/2010 02:55 PM, Avi Kivity wrote:
On 10/19/2010 02:48 PM, Dor Laor wrote:
On 10/19/2010 04:11 AM, Chris Wright wrote:
* Juan Quintela (quint...@redhat.com) wrote:
Please send in any agenda items you are interested in covering.
- 0.13.X -stab
On 10/19/2010 07:48 AM, Dor Laor wrote:
On 10/19/2010 04:11 AM, Chris Wright wrote:
* Juan Quintela (quint...@redhat.com) wrote:
Please send in any agenda items you are interested in covering.
- 0.13.X -stable handoff
- 0.14 planning
- threadlet work
- virtfs proposals
- Live snapshots
On Tue, Oct 19, 2010 at 2:33 PM, Anthony Liguori wrote:
> On 10/19/2010 08:27 AM, Avi Kivity wrote:
>>
>> On 10/19/2010 03:22 PM, Anthony Liguori wrote:
>>>
>>> I had assumed that this would involve:
>>>
>>> qemu -hda windows.img
>>>
>>> (qemu) snapshot ide0-disk0 snap0.img
>>>
>>> 1) create snap
On 10/19/2010 07:48 AM, Dor Laor wrote:
On 10/19/2010 04:11 AM, Chris Wright wrote:
* Juan Quintela (quint...@redhat.com) wrote:
Please send in any agenda items you are interested in covering.
- 0.13.X -stable handoff
- 0.14 planning
- threadlet work
- virtfs proposals
- Live snapshots
On 10/19/2010 03:22 PM, Anthony Liguori wrote:
I had assumed that this would involve:
qemu -hda windows.img
(qemu) snapshot ide0-disk0 snap0.img
1) create snap0.img internally by doing the equivalent of `qemu-img
create -f qcow2 -b windows.img snap0.img'
2) bdrv_flush('ide0-disk0')
3) bdrv
On 10/19/2010 08:03 AM, Avi Kivity wrote:
On 10/19/2010 02:58 PM, Dor Laor wrote:
On 10/19/2010 02:55 PM, Avi Kivity wrote:
On 10/19/2010 02:48 PM, Dor Laor wrote:
On 10/19/2010 04:11 AM, Chris Wright wrote:
* Juan Quintela (quint...@redhat.com) wrote:
Please send in any agenda items you a
On 10/19/2010 02:55 PM, Avi Kivity wrote:
On 10/19/2010 02:48 PM, Dor Laor wrote:
On 10/19/2010 04:11 AM, Chris Wright wrote:
* Juan Quintela (quint...@redhat.com) wrote:
Please send in any agenda items you are interested in covering.
- 0.13.X -stable handoff
- 0.14 planning
- threadlet wor
On 10/19/2010 02:48 PM, Dor Laor wrote:
On 10/19/2010 04:11 AM, Chris Wright wrote:
* Juan Quintela (quint...@redhat.com) wrote:
Please send in any agenda items you are interested in covering.
- 0.13.X -stable handoff
- 0.14 planning
- threadlet work
- virtfs proposals
- Live snapshots
On 10/19/2010 04:11 AM, Chris Wright wrote:
* Juan Quintela (quint...@redhat.com) wrote:
Please send in any agenda items you are interested in covering.
- 0.13.X -stable handoff
- 0.14 planning
- threadlet work
- virtfs proposals
- Live snapshots
- We were asked to add this feature for e
* Juan Quintela (quint...@redhat.com) wrote:
>
> Please send in any agenda items you are interested in covering.
- 0.13.X -stable handoff
- 0.14 planning
- threadlet work
- virtfs proposals
19 matches
Mail list logo