2010/7/12 Chris Wright :
> * Juan Quintela (quint...@redhat.com) wrote:
>>
>> Please send in any agenda items you are interested in covering.
>
> 0.13 ;-)
Is there a plan for it? Which way is it going to happen? Code freeze + rc[0-x]?
--
Regards,
Artyom Tarasenko
solaris/sparc under qemu blog:
On 07/15/2010 01:51 PM, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
On Thu, Jul 15, 2010 at 01:43:28PM -0500, Justin M. Forbes wrote:
On Tue, Jul 13, 2010 at 12:19:21PM -0500, Brian Jackson wrote:
On Tuesday, July 13, 2010 12:01:22 pm Avi Kivity wrote:
On 07/13/2010 07:57 PM, Anthony Liguori wrote
On Thu, Jul 15, 2010 at 01:43:28PM -0500, Justin M. Forbes wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 13, 2010 at 12:19:21PM -0500, Brian Jackson wrote:
> > On Tuesday, July 13, 2010 12:01:22 pm Avi Kivity wrote:
> > > On 07/13/2010 07:57 PM, Anthony Liguori wrote:
> > > >> I'd like to see more frequent stable releases,
On Tue, Jul 13, 2010 at 12:19:21PM -0500, Brian Jackson wrote:
> On Tuesday, July 13, 2010 12:01:22 pm Avi Kivity wrote:
> > On 07/13/2010 07:57 PM, Anthony Liguori wrote:
> > >> I'd like to see more frequent stable releases, at least if the stable
> > >> branch contains fixes to user-reported bugs
On 07/13/2010 08:19 PM, Brian Jackson wrote:
Yes. But in this context I'm interested in stable releases. We have
bugs reported, fixed, and the fix applied, yet the fixes are unreachable
to users.
Especially so since qemu-kvm 0.12-stable hasn't been merged with qemu
basically since 0.12
On Tuesday, July 13, 2010 12:01:22 pm Avi Kivity wrote:
> On 07/13/2010 07:57 PM, Anthony Liguori wrote:
> >> I'd like to see more frequent stable releases, at least if the stable
> >> branch contains fixes to user-reported bugs (or of course security or
> >> data integrity fixes).
> >
> > Would y
On 07/13/2010 07:57 PM, Anthony Liguori wrote:
I'd like to see more frequent stable releases, at least if the stable
branch contains fixes to user-reported bugs (or of course security or
data integrity fixes).
Would you like to see more frequent stable releases or more frequent
master releas
On 07/13/2010 02:40 AM, Avi Kivity wrote:
On 07/13/2010 09:57 AM, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
Avi Kivity a écrit :
On 07/12/2010 05:57 PM, Juan Quintela wrote:
Please send in any agenda items you are interested in covering.
0.12.n+1
I won't be at the KVM call, but I can work on that in the next
On 07/13/2010 05:08 PM, Luiz Capitulino wrote:
I'd like to see more frequent stable releases, at least if the stable
branch contains fixes to user-reported bugs (or of course security or
data integrity fixes).
I remember someone has stepped in to take that work, but I don't exactly
remem
On Tue, 13 Jul 2010 10:40:40 +0300
Avi Kivity wrote:
> On 07/13/2010 09:57 AM, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> > Avi Kivity a écrit :
> >
> >> On 07/12/2010 05:57 PM, Juan Quintela wrote:
> >>
> >>> Please send in any agenda items you are interested in covering.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >> 0
On 07/12/2010 11:38 PM, Avi Kivity wrote:
On 07/13/2010 01:08 AM, Anthony Liguori wrote:
On 07/12/2010 05:07 PM, Anthony Liguori wrote:
On 07/12/2010 04:57 PM, Chris Wright wrote:
* Juan Quintela (quint...@redhat.com) wrote:
Please send in any agenda items you are interested in covering.
0.1
On 07/13/2010 09:57 AM, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
Avi Kivity a écrit :
On 07/12/2010 05:57 PM, Juan Quintela wrote:
Please send in any agenda items you are interested in covering.
0.12.n+1
I won't be at the KVM call, but I can work on that in the next days.
Basically t
Avi Kivity a écrit :
> On 07/12/2010 05:57 PM, Juan Quintela wrote:
>> Please send in any agenda items you are interested in covering.
>>
>>
>
> 0.12.n+1
>
I won't be at the KVM call, but I can work on that in the next days.
Basically the stable tree already contains a lot of fixes and we c
On 07/12/2010 05:57 PM, Juan Quintela wrote:
Please send in any agenda items you are interested in covering.
kvm testsuite
--
I have a truly marvellous patch that fixes the bug which this
signature is too narrow to contain.
On 07/13/2010 01:08 AM, Anthony Liguori wrote:
On 07/12/2010 05:07 PM, Anthony Liguori wrote:
On 07/12/2010 04:57 PM, Chris Wright wrote:
* Juan Quintela (quint...@redhat.com) wrote:
Please send in any agenda items you are interested in covering.
0.13 ;-)
- vCPU limits; how much testing has
On 07/12/2010 05:57 PM, Juan Quintela wrote:
Please send in any agenda items you are interested in covering.
0.12.n+1
--
I have a truly marvellous patch that fixes the bug which this
signature is too narrow to contain.
On 07/12/2010 05:07 PM, Anthony Liguori wrote:
On 07/12/2010 04:57 PM, Chris Wright wrote:
* Juan Quintela (quint...@redhat.com) wrote:
Please send in any agenda items you are interested in covering.
0.13 ;-)
- vCPU limits; how much testing has anyone done of 64-way guests?
- Finding a way t
On 07/12/2010 04:57 PM, Chris Wright wrote:
* Juan Quintela (quint...@redhat.com) wrote:
Please send in any agenda items you are interested in covering.
0.13 ;-)
- vCPU limits; how much testing has anyone done of 64-way guests?
- Finding a way to enable virtio by default; any cl
* Juan Quintela (quint...@redhat.com) wrote:
>
> Please send in any agenda items you are interested in covering.
0.13 ;-)
19 matches
Mail list logo
