On 28.04.2010 12:45, Gleb Natapov wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 28, 2010 at 12:41:51PM +0200, Jes Sorensen wrote:
>
>> The CPU declarations are particularly tricky as they get pretty big and
>> complex and need to live in the DSDT, whereas a lot of other things we
>> can shift off to separate SSDT tables
On Wed, Apr 28, 2010 at 12:41:51PM +0200, Jes Sorensen wrote:
> On 04/28/10 12:30, Gleb Natapov wrote:
> > On Wed, Apr 28, 2010 at 11:31:00AM +0200, Jes Sorensen wrote:
> >> On 04/22/10 03:12, Kevin O'Connor wrote:
> >> Generating the more complex tables dynamically would be preferred, but
> >> it
On 04/28/10 12:30, Gleb Natapov wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 28, 2010 at 11:31:00AM +0200, Jes Sorensen wrote:
>> On 04/22/10 03:12, Kevin O'Connor wrote:
>> Generating the more complex tables dynamically would be preferred, but
>> it requires like half an AML compiler in Seabios, so it kinda stalled
>> th
On Wed, Apr 28, 2010 at 11:31:00AM +0200, Jes Sorensen wrote:
> On 04/22/10 03:12, Kevin O'Connor wrote:
> > As I understand it, the hotplug support was only in the kvm copy of
> > bochs bios. It also limited the number of cpus one could use (I think
> > 16).
> >
> > The current smp support in Se
On 04/22/10 03:12, Kevin O'Connor wrote:
> As I understand it, the hotplug support was only in the kvm copy of
> bochs bios. It also limited the number of cpus one could use (I think
> 16).
>
> The current smp support in SeaBIOS doesn't limit the number of cpus.
>
> So, there has been reluctance
