On Mon, Jan 18, 2010 at 7:41 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 18, 2010 at 07:53:25PM +0200, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
>> On Mon, Jan 18, 2010 at 05:50:35PM +, Blue Swirl wrote:
>> > On Mon, Jan 18, 2010 at 10:56 AM, Michael S. Tsirkin
>> > wrote:
>> > > Alexander, so I assume the
On Mon, Jan 18, 2010 at 07:53:25PM +0200, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 18, 2010 at 05:50:35PM +, Blue Swirl wrote:
> > On Mon, Jan 18, 2010 at 10:56 AM, Michael S. Tsirkin
> > wrote:
> > > Alexander, so I assume the following patchset should be enough for you
> > > to implement u3
On Mon, Jan 18, 2010 at 05:50:35PM +, Blue Swirl wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 18, 2010 at 10:56 AM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > Alexander, so I assume the following patchset should be enough for you
> > to implement u3 support, simply by creating your own rwhandler, and
> > using pci_data_read/write
On Mon, Jan 18, 2010 at 10:56 AM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> Alexander, so I assume the following patchset should be enough for you
> to implement u3 support, simply by creating your own rwhandler, and
> using pci_data_read/write directly there. I have pushed it to a
> temporary branch in my tree
