Markus Armbruster wrote:
> Luiz Capitulino writes:
>
>> On Sun, 23 May 2010 12:59:26 +0200
>> Jan Kiszka wrote:
>>
>>> From: Jan Kiszka
>>>
>>> Ported commands that are marked 'user_only' will not be considered for
>>> QMP monitor sessions. This allows to implement new commands that do not
>>>
Luiz Capitulino writes:
> On Sun, 23 May 2010 12:59:26 +0200
> Jan Kiszka wrote:
>
>> From: Jan Kiszka
>>
>> Ported commands that are marked 'user_only' will not be considered for
>> QMP monitor sessions. This allows to implement new commands that do not
>> (yet) provide a sufficiently stable
On Fri, 28 May 2010 00:20:08 +0200
Jan Kiszka wrote:
> Luiz Capitulino wrote:
> > On Sun, 23 May 2010 12:59:26 +0200
> > Jan Kiszka wrote:
> >
> >> From: Jan Kiszka
> >>
> >> Ported commands that are marked 'user_only' will not be considered for
> >> QMP monitor sessions. This allows to implem
Luiz Capitulino wrote:
> On Sun, 23 May 2010 12:59:26 +0200
> Jan Kiszka wrote:
>
>> From: Jan Kiszka
>>
>> Ported commands that are marked 'user_only' will not be considered for
>> QMP monitor sessions. This allows to implement new commands that do not
>> (yet) provide a sufficiently stable int
On Sun, 23 May 2010 12:59:26 +0200
Jan Kiszka wrote:
> From: Jan Kiszka
>
> Ported commands that are marked 'user_only' will not be considered for
> QMP monitor sessions. This allows to implement new commands that do not
> (yet) provide a sufficiently stable interface for QMP use (e.g.
> device