On Tue, Jul 13, 2010 at 02:11:10PM +0300, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 13, 2010 at 09:35:49AM +0300, Gleb Natapov wrote:
> > On Mon, Jul 12, 2010 at 06:00:20PM -0500, Anthony Liguori wrote:
> > > On 07/12/2010 05:42 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > > >On Mon, Jul 12, 2010 at 04:07:21PM
On Tue, Jul 13, 2010 at 09:35:49AM +0300, Gleb Natapov wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 12, 2010 at 06:00:20PM -0500, Anthony Liguori wrote:
> > On 07/12/2010 05:42 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > >On Mon, Jul 12, 2010 at 04:07:21PM -0500, Anthony Liguori wrote:
> > >>On 07/12/2010 12:48 PM, Michael S. Tsirk
On Mon, Jul 12, 2010 at 06:00:20PM -0500, Anthony Liguori wrote:
> On 07/12/2010 05:42 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> >On Mon, Jul 12, 2010 at 04:07:21PM -0500, Anthony Liguori wrote:
> >>On 07/12/2010 12:48 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> >>>We do range check for size, and get size as buffer,
> >
On 07/12/2010 05:42 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
On Mon, Jul 12, 2010 at 04:07:21PM -0500, Anthony Liguori wrote:
On 07/12/2010 12:48 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
We do range check for size, and get size as buffer,
but copy size + 4 bytes (4 is for FCS).
Let's copy size bytes but pu
On Mon, Jul 12, 2010 at 04:07:21PM -0500, Anthony Liguori wrote:
> On 07/12/2010 12:48 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> >We do range check for size, and get size as buffer,
> >but copy size + 4 bytes (4 is for FCS).
> >Let's copy size bytes but put size + 4 in length.
> >
> >Signed-off-by: Michael S
On 07/12/2010 04:30 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
On Mon, Jul 12, 2010 at 04:07:21PM -0500, Anthony Liguori wrote:
On 07/12/2010 12:48 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
We do range check for size, and get size as buffer,
but copy size + 4 bytes (4 is for FCS).
Let's copy size bytes but pu
On Mon, Jul 12, 2010 at 04:07:21PM -0500, Anthony Liguori wrote:
> On 07/12/2010 12:48 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> >We do range check for size, and get size as buffer,
> >but copy size + 4 bytes (4 is for FCS).
> >Let's copy size bytes but put size + 4 in length.
> >
> >Signed-off-by: Michael S
On 07/12/2010 12:48 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
We do range check for size, and get size as buffer,
but copy size + 4 bytes (4 is for FCS).
Let's copy size bytes but put size + 4 in length.
Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin
I think I'd feel slightly better if we zero'd out the FCS before
On Mon, 2010-07-12 at 20:48 +0300, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> We do range check for size, and get size as buffer,
> but copy size + 4 bytes (4 is for FCS).
> Let's copy size bytes but put size + 4 in length.
>
> Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin
> ---
>
> Anthony, Alex, please review.
Looks fi
