On Fri, Apr 01, 2011 at 07:52:52PM +0200, Stefan Weil wrote:
> [snip]
>
> Thank you for your review, especially for the hints at lduw_phys
> and potential alignment issues. I'll apply them to a new version
> of this patch.
>
> There was already a function without prefix (stl_le_phys),
> and the n
Am 31.03.2011 23:52, schrieb Michael S. Tsirkin:
On Thu, Mar 31, 2011 at 10:33:24PM +0200, Stefan Weil wrote:
Like other Intel devices, e100 (eepro100) uses little endian byte order.
This patch was tested with these combinations:
i386 host, i386 + mipsel guests (le-le)
mipsel host, i386 guest
On Thu, Mar 31, 2011 at 10:33:24PM +0200, Stefan Weil wrote:
> Like other Intel devices, e100 (eepro100) uses little endian byte order.
>
> This patch was tested with these combinations:
>
> i386 host, i386 + mipsel guests (le-le)
> mipsel host, i386 guest (le-le)
> i386 host, mips + ppc guests (
