Re: [Qemu-devel] Re: [PATCH 0/3]: BLOCK_WATERMARK QMP event

2010-03-10 Thread Luiz Capitulino
On Wed, 10 Mar 2010 10:28:43 +0100 Christoph Hellwig wrote: > On Wed, Mar 10, 2010 at 09:33:31AM +0100, Kevin Wolf wrote: > > When should a low watermark trigger? Images only ever grow, so testing > > if the highest allocated block goes below some watermark would never > > work (except for some u

Re: [Qemu-devel] Re: [PATCH 0/3]: BLOCK_WATERMARK QMP event

2010-03-10 Thread Christoph Hellwig
On Wed, Mar 10, 2010 at 09:33:31AM +0100, Kevin Wolf wrote: > When should a low watermark trigger? Images only ever grow, so testing > if the highest allocated block goes below some watermark would never > work (except for some unlikely special cases like deleting a snapshot > after which no new cl

[Qemu-devel] Re: [PATCH 0/3]: BLOCK_WATERMARK QMP event

2010-03-10 Thread Kevin Wolf
Am 09.03.2010 23:53, schrieb Luiz Capitulino: > Hi, > > This series is based on a previous series submitted by Uri Lublin: > > http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2009-03/msg00864.html > > Details on the patches, except for this question: does it make sense to have > a 'low' watermar