[Qemu-devel] Re: [PATCH] use absolute URLs for .gitmodules

2010-03-10 Thread Paolo Bonzini
On 03/10/2010 03:21 PM, Anthony Liguori wrote: If we also get rid of the savannah git repo, or plan to do so, I have no issue with reverting this patch. If someone can suggest a solution for mailing list hosting, I'd be happy to leave Savannah tomorrow. There is still the problem that "g

[Qemu-devel] Re: [PATCH] use absolute URLs for .gitmodules

2010-03-10 Thread Anthony Liguori
On 03/10/2010 08:44 AM, Avi Kivity wrote: On 03/10/2010 04:21 PM, Anthony Liguori wrote: On 03/10/2010 04:15 AM, Paolo Bonzini wrote: If we also get rid of the savannah git repo, or plan to do so, I have no issue with reverting this patch. If someone can suggest a solution for mailing list ho

[Qemu-devel] Re: [PATCH] use absolute URLs for .gitmodules

2010-03-10 Thread Avi Kivity
On 03/10/2010 04:21 PM, Anthony Liguori wrote: On 03/10/2010 04:15 AM, Paolo Bonzini wrote: If we also get rid of the savannah git repo, or plan to do so, I have no issue with reverting this patch. If someone can suggest a solution for mailing list hosting, I'd be happy to leave Savannah tomo

[Qemu-devel] Re: [PATCH] use absolute URLs for .gitmodules

2010-03-10 Thread Anthony Liguori
On 03/10/2010 04:15 AM, Paolo Bonzini wrote: If we also get rid of the savannah git repo, or plan to do so, I have no issue with reverting this patch. If someone can suggest a solution for mailing list hosting, I'd be happy to leave Savannah tomorrow. I'm not overly eager to do a mailing lis

[Qemu-devel] Re: [PATCH] use absolute URLs for .gitmodules

2010-03-10 Thread Paolo Bonzini
On 03/09/2010 06:08 PM, Anthony Liguori wrote: On 03/09/2010 10:38 AM, Paolo Bonzini wrote: diff --git a/.gitmodules b/.gitmodules index dd4745e..5217ce7 100644 --- a/.gitmodules +++ b/.gitmodules @@ -1,6 +1,6 @@ [submodule "roms/vgabios"] path = roms/vgabios - url = ../vgabios.git + url = git:/

[Qemu-devel] Re: [PATCH] use absolute URLs for .gitmodules

2010-03-07 Thread Paolo Bonzini
On 03/06/2010 11:10 PM, Aurelien Jarno wrote: Is the slash at the end of the URL really wanted? It works either with or without. Paolo