On Thu, Nov 18, 2010 at 06:10:12PM +0200, Gleb Natapov wrote:
> > WHQL includes surprise removal tests. So any card that passed
> > that will work with surprise removal.
> >
> Yeah. But it is not real "surprise removal". It will not crash qemu.
That was the problem I saw. That the way qxl is writ
On Thu, Nov 18, 2010 at 06:04:56PM +0200, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 18, 2010 at 05:42:41PM +0200, Gleb Natapov wrote:
> > On Thu, Nov 18, 2010 at 05:25:48PM +0200, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > > On Thu, Nov 18, 2010 at 04:57:55PM +0200, Gleb Natapov wrote:
> > > > On Thu, Nov 18, 201
On Thu, Nov 18, 2010 at 05:42:41PM +0200, Gleb Natapov wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 18, 2010 at 05:25:48PM +0200, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > On Thu, Nov 18, 2010 at 04:57:55PM +0200, Gleb Natapov wrote:
> > > On Thu, Nov 18, 2010 at 04:04:14PM +0200, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > > > > > What do you wan
On Thu, Nov 18, 2010 at 05:25:48PM +0200, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 18, 2010 at 04:57:55PM +0200, Gleb Natapov wrote:
> > On Thu, Nov 18, 2010 at 04:04:14PM +0200, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > > > > What do you want to know?
> > > > How it claims access to framebuffer. Legacy VGA has
On Thu, Nov 18, 2010 at 04:57:55PM +0200, Gleb Natapov wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 18, 2010 at 04:04:14PM +0200, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > > > What do you want to know?
> > > How it claims access to framebuffer. Legacy VGA has not only IO space
> > > but MMIO space too.
> >
> > There's a separate bit
On Thu, Nov 18, 2010 at 04:04:14PM +0200, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > > What do you want to know?
> > How it claims access to framebuffer. Legacy VGA has not only IO space
> > but MMIO space too.
>
> There's a separate bit to enable memory is that is what you
> are asking about.
>
> The spec sp
On Thu, Nov 18, 2010 at 02:27:26PM +0200, Gleb Natapov wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 18, 2010 at 02:03:11PM +0200, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > On Thu, Nov 18, 2010 at 01:55:29PM +0200, Gleb Natapov wrote:
> > > On Thu, Nov 18, 2010 at 01:33:08PM +0200, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > > > On Thu, Nov 18, 201
On Thu, Nov 18, 2010 at 02:03:11PM +0200, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 18, 2010 at 01:55:29PM +0200, Gleb Natapov wrote:
> > On Thu, Nov 18, 2010 at 01:33:08PM +0200, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > > On Thu, Nov 18, 2010 at 11:57:51AM +0200, Gleb Natapov wrote:
> > > > On Thu, Nov 18, 201
On Thu, Nov 18, 2010 at 01:55:29PM +0200, Gleb Natapov wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 18, 2010 at 01:33:08PM +0200, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > On Thu, Nov 18, 2010 at 11:57:51AM +0200, Gleb Natapov wrote:
> > > On Thu, Nov 18, 2010 at 11:30:27AM +0200, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > > > On Thu, Nov 18, 201
On Thu, Nov 18, 2010 at 01:33:08PM +0200, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 18, 2010 at 11:57:51AM +0200, Gleb Natapov wrote:
> > On Thu, Nov 18, 2010 at 11:30:27AM +0200, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > > On Thu, Nov 18, 2010 at 11:11:49AM +0200, Gleb Natapov wrote:
> > > > On Thu, Nov 18, 201
On Thu, Nov 18, 2010 at 11:57:51AM +0200, Gleb Natapov wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 18, 2010 at 11:30:27AM +0200, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > On Thu, Nov 18, 2010 at 11:11:49AM +0200, Gleb Natapov wrote:
> > > On Thu, Nov 18, 2010 at 11:03:21AM +0200, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > > > On Thu, Nov 18, 201
Hi,
I still think that vga cards should simply be flagged to be not
hot-pluggable.
Send a patch.
[x] done.
cheers,
Gerd
On Thu, Nov 18, 2010 at 11:30:27AM +0200, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 18, 2010 at 11:11:49AM +0200, Gleb Natapov wrote:
> > On Thu, Nov 18, 2010 at 11:03:21AM +0200, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > > On Thu, Nov 18, 2010 at 10:09:35AM +0200, Gleb Natapov wrote:
> > > > On Wed, Nov 17, 201
On Thu, Nov 18, 2010 at 11:11:49AM +0200, Gleb Natapov wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 18, 2010 at 11:03:21AM +0200, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > On Thu, Nov 18, 2010 at 10:09:35AM +0200, Gleb Natapov wrote:
> > > On Wed, Nov 17, 2010 at 08:00:08PM +0200, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > > > > >> If so: does q
On Thu, Nov 18, 2010 at 11:03:21AM +0200, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 18, 2010 at 10:09:35AM +0200, Gleb Natapov wrote:
> > On Wed, Nov 17, 2010 at 08:00:08PM +0200, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > > > >> If so: does qemu
> > > > >>emulate this correctly?
> > > > >
> > > > >It mostly doe
On Thu, Nov 18, 2010 at 09:22:02AM +0100, Gerd Hoffmann wrote:
> On 11/18/10 09:09, Gleb Natapov wrote:
> >On Wed, Nov 17, 2010 at 08:00:08PM +0200, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > If so: does qemu
> >emulate this correctly?
>
> It mostly does.
> >>>
> >>>I doubt it actually enables
On Thu, Nov 18, 2010 at 10:09:35AM +0200, Gleb Natapov wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 17, 2010 at 08:00:08PM +0200, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > > >> If so: does qemu
> > > >>emulate this correctly?
> > > >
> > > >It mostly does.
> > >
> > > I doubt it actually enables/disables the legacy vga ports.
> >
On 11/18/10 09:09, Gleb Natapov wrote:
On Wed, Nov 17, 2010 at 08:00:08PM +0200, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
If so: does qemu
emulate this correctly?
It mostly does.
I doubt it actually enables/disables the legacy vga ports.
I'll check when I have the time. We can fix it if it doesn't,
S
On Wed, Nov 17, 2010 at 08:00:08PM +0200, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > >> If so: does qemu
> > >>emulate this correctly?
> > >
> > >It mostly does.
> >
> > I doubt it actually enables/disables the legacy vga ports.
>
> I'll check when I have the time. We can fix it if it doesn't,
>
So many gue
On Wed, Nov 17, 2010 at 06:02:39PM +0100, Gerd Hoffmann wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Better don't try ...
> >>>
> >>>Better prevent it then?
> >>
> >>How can I do that?
>
> Question still stands: Is there some way to disable hotplug for
> certain pci devices?
Not sure. It's really a work-around bug,
Hi,
Better don't try ...
Better prevent it then?
How can I do that?
Question still stands: Is there some way to disable hotplug for certain
pci devices?
How does this work btw? Only
one vga adapter can drive the legacy vga ports, right? Is there
some way to enable/disable this p
On Wed, Nov 17, 2010 at 04:20:45PM +0100, Gerd Hoffmann wrote:
> Hi,
>
> +qxl0 = qxl;
> >>>
> >>>What happens when this device is then removed?
> >>
> >>Better don't try ...
> >
> >Better prevent it then?
>
> How can I do that?
>
> >>The primary vga can't be hot-unplugged in qemu.
Hi,
+qxl0 = qxl;
What happens when this device is then removed?
Better don't try ...
Better prevent it then?
How can I do that?
The primary vga can't be hot-unplugged in qemu. Not only because
the qxl0 pointer would point into nowhere in this case, but also
because you can't
On Wed, Nov 17, 2010 at 02:28:21PM +0100, Gerd Hoffmann wrote:
> On 11/16/10 18:43, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> >On Tue, Nov 02, 2010 at 02:34:58PM +0100, Gerd Hoffmann wrote:
> >>+if (ram_size< 32 * 1024 * 1024)
> >>+ram_size = 32 * 1024 * 1024;
> >>+vga_common_init(vg
On 11/16/10 18:43, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
On Tue, Nov 02, 2010 at 02:34:58PM +0100, Gerd Hoffmann wrote:
+if (ram_size< 32 * 1024 * 1024)
+ram_size = 32 * 1024 * 1024;
+vga_common_init(vga, ram_size);
+vga_init(vga);
+register_ioport_write(0x3c0, 1
On Tue, Nov 02, 2010 at 02:34:58PM +0100, Gerd Hoffmann wrote:
> +if (ram_size < 32 * 1024 * 1024)
> +ram_size = 32 * 1024 * 1024;
> +vga_common_init(vga, ram_size);
> +vga_init(vga);
> +register_ioport_write(0x3c0, 16, 1, qxl_vga_ioport_write, vga);
> +
26 matches
Mail list logo
