Anthony Liguori wrote:
On Tue, 2007-09-04 at 23:27 +0100, Thiemo Seufer wrote:
Brian Johnson wrote:
[snip]
My initial thought is to make the libraries at the individual device
level.
It would be good to have a general mechanism for bus providers, interrupts,
APICs, chipsets, etc. as well,
On Tue, 2007-09-04 at 23:27 +0100, Thiemo Seufer wrote:
> Brian Johnson wrote:
> [snip]
> >> My initial thought is to make the libraries at the individual device
> >> level.
> >
> > It would be good to have a general mechanism for bus providers, interrupts,
> > APICs, chipsets, etc. as well, so w
On Tue, 2007-09-04 at 23:27 +0100, Thiemo Seufer wrote:
> Brian Johnson wrote:
> [snip]
> >> My initial thought is to make the libraries at the individual device
> >> level.
> >
> > It would be good to have a general mechanism for bus providers, interrupts,
> > APICs, chipsets, etc. as well, so w
Brian Johnson wrote:
[snip]
>> My initial thought is to make the libraries at the individual device
>> level.
>
> It would be good to have a general mechanism for bus providers, interrupts,
> APICs, chipsets, etc. as well, so we could emulate fancier architectures
> than a simple PC (or simple Sp
On Tue, 2007-09-04 at 14:57 -0500, Brian Johnson wrote:
> Anthony Liguori wrote:
> > With things like KVM making it relatively simple to do CPU emulation, if
> > QEMU's device emulation was available as a library (even a GPL library),
> > it would be pretty easy to do interesting things without fo
Anthony Liguori wrote:
On Mon, 2007-09-03 at 18:41 +0300, Blue Swirl wrote:
Sorry to ruin your GSoC project, but the plugin system was discussed
last year, please see this thread:
http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.emulators.qemu/14341/focus=14473
I've always agreed that allowing plugins was n
