On Tue, Dec 21, 2010 at 07:13:57PM +0900, Isaku Yamahata wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 16, 2010 at 10:36:08AM +0200, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > On Thu, Dec 16, 2010 at 04:08:16PM +0900, Isaku Yamahata wrote:
> > > On Wed, Dec 15, 2010 at 08:27:49AM -0700, Alex Williamson wrote:
> > > > On Wed, 2010-12-15
On Thu, Dec 16, 2010 at 10:36:08AM +0200, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 16, 2010 at 04:08:16PM +0900, Isaku Yamahata wrote:
> > On Wed, Dec 15, 2010 at 08:27:49AM -0700, Alex Williamson wrote:
> > > On Wed, 2010-12-15 at 11:56 +0200, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > > > On Tue, Dec 14, 2010
On Thu, Dec 16, 2010 at 04:08:16PM +0900, Isaku Yamahata wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 15, 2010 at 08:27:49AM -0700, Alex Williamson wrote:
> > On Wed, 2010-12-15 at 11:56 +0200, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > > On Tue, Dec 14, 2010 at 11:34:53AM -0700, Alex Williamson wrote:
> > > > On Tue, 2010-12-14 at 14
On Wed, Dec 15, 2010 at 08:27:49AM -0700, Alex Williamson wrote:
> On Wed, 2010-12-15 at 11:56 +0200, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > On Tue, Dec 14, 2010 at 11:34:53AM -0700, Alex Williamson wrote:
> > > On Tue, 2010-12-14 at 14:26 +0200, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > > > On Mon, Dec 13, 2010 at 10:
On Wed, 2010-12-15 at 11:56 +0200, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 14, 2010 at 11:34:53AM -0700, Alex Williamson wrote:
> > On Tue, 2010-12-14 at 14:26 +0200, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > > On Mon, Dec 13, 2010 at 10:04:24PM -0700, Alex Williamson wrote:
> > > >
> > > > I've only ever see
On Tue, Dec 14, 2010 at 11:34:53AM -0700, Alex Williamson wrote:
> On Tue, 2010-12-14 at 14:26 +0200, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > On Mon, Dec 13, 2010 at 10:04:24PM -0700, Alex Williamson wrote:
> > >
> > > I've only ever seen config[PCI_SECONDARY_BUS] be non-zero for an
> > > assigned device, s
On Tue, 2010-12-14 at 14:26 +0200, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 13, 2010 at 10:04:24PM -0700, Alex Williamson wrote:
> >
> > I've only ever seen config[PCI_SECONDARY_BUS] be non-zero for an
> > assigned device, so I'm pretty sure we're not going to hurt migration,
> > but the code is cl
On Mon, Dec 13, 2010 at 10:04:24PM -0700, Alex Williamson wrote:
> On Tue, 2010-12-14 at 06:57 +0200, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > On Mon, Dec 13, 2010 at 09:49:21PM -0700, Alex Williamson wrote:
> > > On Tue, 2010-12-14 at 06:46 +0200, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > > > On Mon, Dec 13, 2010 at 01:
On Tue, 2010-12-14 at 06:57 +0200, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 13, 2010 at 09:49:21PM -0700, Alex Williamson wrote:
> > On Tue, 2010-12-14 at 06:46 +0200, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > > On Mon, Dec 13, 2010 at 01:04:23PM -0700, Alex Williamson wrote:
> > > > On Mon, 2010-11-08 at 13:22
On Mon, Dec 13, 2010 at 09:49:21PM -0700, Alex Williamson wrote:
> On Tue, 2010-12-14 at 06:46 +0200, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > On Mon, Dec 13, 2010 at 01:04:23PM -0700, Alex Williamson wrote:
> > > On Mon, 2010-11-08 at 13:22 +0200, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > > > On Mon, Oct 04, 2010 at 03:
On Tue, 2010-12-14 at 06:46 +0200, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 13, 2010 at 01:04:23PM -0700, Alex Williamson wrote:
> > On Mon, 2010-11-08 at 13:22 +0200, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > > On Mon, Oct 04, 2010 at 03:53:11PM -0600, Alex Williamson wrote:
> > > > pcibus_dev_print() was erro
On Mon, Dec 13, 2010 at 01:04:23PM -0700, Alex Williamson wrote:
> On Mon, 2010-11-08 at 13:22 +0200, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > On Mon, Oct 04, 2010 at 03:53:11PM -0600, Alex Williamson wrote:
> > > pcibus_dev_print() was erroneously retrieving the device bus
> > > number from the secondary bus
On Mon, 2010-11-08 at 13:22 +0200, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 04, 2010 at 03:53:11PM -0600, Alex Williamson wrote:
> > pcibus_dev_print() was erroneously retrieving the device bus
> > number from the secondary bus number offset of the device
> > instead of the bridge above the device.
On Mon, Nov 22, 2010 at 06:41:28PM +0200, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 22, 2010 at 04:58:11PM +0200, Gleb Natapov wrote:
> > On Mon, Nov 22, 2010 at 04:56:16PM +0200, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > > On Mon, Nov 22, 2010 at 04:52:32PM +0200, Gleb Natapov wrote:
> > > > On Mon, Nov 22, 201
On Mon, Nov 22, 2010 at 04:58:11PM +0200, Gleb Natapov wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 22, 2010 at 04:56:16PM +0200, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > On Mon, Nov 22, 2010 at 04:52:32PM +0200, Gleb Natapov wrote:
> > > On Mon, Nov 22, 2010 at 04:50:29PM +0200, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > > > On Mon, Nov 22, 201
On Mon, Nov 22, 2010 at 04:56:16PM +0200, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 22, 2010 at 04:52:32PM +0200, Gleb Natapov wrote:
> > On Mon, Nov 22, 2010 at 04:50:29PM +0200, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > > On Mon, Nov 22, 2010 at 03:04:51PM +0200, Gleb Natapov wrote:
> > > > On Mon, Nov 22, 201
On Mon, Nov 22, 2010 at 04:52:32PM +0200, Gleb Natapov wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 22, 2010 at 04:50:29PM +0200, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > On Mon, Nov 22, 2010 at 03:04:51PM +0200, Gleb Natapov wrote:
> > > On Mon, Nov 22, 2010 at 10:16:57AM +0200, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > > > On Mon, Nov 22, 201
On Mon, Nov 22, 2010 at 04:50:29PM +0200, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 22, 2010 at 03:04:51PM +0200, Gleb Natapov wrote:
> > On Mon, Nov 22, 2010 at 10:16:57AM +0200, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > > On Mon, Nov 22, 2010 at 09:37:07AM +0200, Gleb Natapov wrote:
> > > > > > > It's probably
On Mon, Nov 22, 2010 at 03:04:51PM +0200, Gleb Natapov wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 22, 2010 at 10:16:57AM +0200, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > On Mon, Nov 22, 2010 at 09:37:07AM +0200, Gleb Natapov wrote:
> > > > > > It's probably required to make them stable anyway.
> > > > > >
> > > > > Why?
> > > >
>
On Mon, Nov 22, 2010 at 10:16:57AM +0200, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 22, 2010 at 09:37:07AM +0200, Gleb Natapov wrote:
> > > > > It's probably required to make them stable anyway.
> > > > >
> > > > Why?
> > >
> > > To avoid bus renumbering on reboot after you add a pci-to-pci bridge.
On Mon, Nov 22, 2010 at 09:37:07AM +0200, Gleb Natapov wrote:
> > > > It's probably required to make them stable anyway.
> > > >
> > > Why?
> >
> > To avoid bus renumbering on reboot after you add a pci-to-pci bridge.
> >
> Why should qemu care?
Stable bus numbering is a feature *users* care ab
On Sun, Nov 21, 2010 at 10:39:31PM +0200, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 21, 2010 at 09:29:59PM +0200, Gleb Natapov wrote:
> > > We can control the bus numbers that the BIOS will assign to pci root.
> > And if you need to insert device that sits behind pci-to-pci bridge? Do
> > you want to
On Sun, Nov 21, 2010 at 09:29:59PM +0200, Gleb Natapov wrote:
> > We can control the bus numbers that the BIOS will assign to pci root.
> And if you need to insert device that sits behind pci-to-pci bridge? Do
> you want to control that bus address too? And bus number do not unambiguously
> describ
On Sun, Nov 21, 2010 at 08:22:03PM +0200, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 21, 2010 at 06:01:11PM +0200, Gleb Natapov wrote:
> > > This FW is given to guest by qemu. It only assigns bus numbers
> > > because qemu told it to do so.
> > Seabios is just a guest qemu ships. There are other FW fo
On Sun, Nov 21, 2010 at 06:01:11PM +0200, Gleb Natapov wrote:
> > This FW is given to guest by qemu. It only assigns bus numbers
> > because qemu told it to do so.
> Seabios is just a guest qemu ships. There are other FW for qemu.
We don't support them though, do we?
> Bochs
> bios, openfirmware,
On Sun, Nov 21, 2010 at 06:38:31PM +0200, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 21, 2010 at 06:01:11PM +0200, Gleb Natapov wrote:
> > On Sun, Nov 21, 2010 at 04:48:44PM +0200, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > > On Sun, Nov 21, 2010 at 02:50:14PM +0200, Gleb Natapov wrote:
> > > > On Sun, Nov 21, 201
On Sun, Nov 21, 2010 at 06:01:11PM +0200, Gleb Natapov wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 21, 2010 at 04:48:44PM +0200, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > On Sun, Nov 21, 2010 at 02:50:14PM +0200, Gleb Natapov wrote:
> > > On Sun, Nov 21, 2010 at 01:53:26PM +0200, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > > > > > The guests.
> >
On Sun, Nov 21, 2010 at 04:48:44PM +0200, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 21, 2010 at 02:50:14PM +0200, Gleb Natapov wrote:
> > On Sun, Nov 21, 2010 at 01:53:26PM +0200, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > > > > The guests.
> > > > Which one? There are many guests. Your favorite?
> > > >
> > > >
On Sun, Nov 21, 2010 at 02:50:14PM +0200, Gleb Natapov wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 21, 2010 at 01:53:26PM +0200, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > > > The guests.
> > > Which one? There are many guests. Your favorite?
> > >
> > > > For CLI, we need an easy way to map a device in guest to the
> > > > device i
On Sun, Nov 21, 2010 at 01:53:26PM +0200, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > > The guests.
> > Which one? There are many guests. Your favorite?
> >
> > > For CLI, we need an easy way to map a device in guest to the
> > > device in qemu and back.
> > Then use eth0, /dev/sdb, or even C:. Your way is not
On Sun, Nov 21, 2010 at 12:19:03PM +0200, Gleb Natapov wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 21, 2010 at 11:50:18AM +0200, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > On Sun, Nov 21, 2010 at 10:32:11AM +0200, Gleb Natapov wrote:
> > > On Sat, Nov 20, 2010 at 10:17:09PM +0200, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > > > On Fri, Nov 19, 201
On Sun, Nov 21, 2010 at 11:50:18AM +0200, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 21, 2010 at 10:32:11AM +0200, Gleb Natapov wrote:
> > On Sat, Nov 20, 2010 at 10:17:09PM +0200, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > > On Fri, Nov 19, 2010 at 10:38:42PM +0200, Gleb Natapov wrote:
> > > > On Fri, Nov 19, 201
On Sun, Nov 21, 2010 at 10:32:11AM +0200, Gleb Natapov wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 20, 2010 at 10:17:09PM +0200, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > On Fri, Nov 19, 2010 at 10:38:42PM +0200, Gleb Natapov wrote:
> > > On Fri, Nov 19, 2010 at 06:02:58PM +0100, Markus Armbruster wrote:
> > > > "Michael S. Tsirkin"
On Sat, Nov 20, 2010 at 10:17:09PM +0200, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 19, 2010 at 10:38:42PM +0200, Gleb Natapov wrote:
> > On Fri, Nov 19, 2010 at 06:02:58PM +0100, Markus Armbruster wrote:
> > > "Michael S. Tsirkin" writes:
> > >
> > > > On Tue, Nov 09, 2010 at 11:41:43AM +0900, Isa
On Fri, Nov 19, 2010 at 10:38:42PM +0200, Gleb Natapov wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 19, 2010 at 06:02:58PM +0100, Markus Armbruster wrote:
> > "Michael S. Tsirkin" writes:
> >
> > > On Tue, Nov 09, 2010 at 11:41:43AM +0900, Isaku Yamahata wrote:
> > >> On Mon, Nov 08, 2010 at 06:26:33PM +0200, Michael S.
On Fri, Nov 19, 2010 at 06:02:58PM +0100, Markus Armbruster wrote:
> "Michael S. Tsirkin" writes:
>
> > On Tue, Nov 09, 2010 at 11:41:43AM +0900, Isaku Yamahata wrote:
> >> On Mon, Nov 08, 2010 at 06:26:33PM +0200, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> >> > Replace bus number with slot numbers of parent br
"Michael S. Tsirkin" writes:
> On Tue, Nov 09, 2010 at 11:41:43AM +0900, Isaku Yamahata wrote:
>> On Mon, Nov 08, 2010 at 06:26:33PM +0200, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
>> > Replace bus number with slot numbers of parent bridges up to the root.
>> > This works for root bridge in a compatible way bec
On Tue, Nov 09, 2010 at 11:41:43AM +0900, Isaku Yamahata wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 08, 2010 at 06:26:33PM +0200, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > Replace bus number with slot numbers of parent bridges up to the root.
> > This works for root bridge in a compatible way because bus number there
> > is hard-co
On Mon, Nov 08, 2010 at 06:26:33PM +0200, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> Replace bus number with slot numbers of parent bridges up to the root.
> This works for root bridge in a compatible way because bus number there
> is hard-coded to 0.
> IMO nested bridges are broken anyway, no way to be compatibl
On Mon, Nov 08, 2010 at 07:08:37PM +0200, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 08, 2010 at 07:00:15PM +0200, Gleb Natapov wrote:
> > On Mon, Nov 08, 2010 at 06:26:33PM +0200, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > > On Mon, Nov 08, 2010 at 07:52:12AM -0700, Alex Williamson wrote:
> > > > On Mon, 2010-11-
On Mon, Nov 08, 2010 at 07:00:15PM +0200, Gleb Natapov wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 08, 2010 at 06:26:33PM +0200, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > On Mon, Nov 08, 2010 at 07:52:12AM -0700, Alex Williamson wrote:
> > > On Mon, 2010-11-08 at 13:22 +0200, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > > > On Mon, Oct 04, 2010 at
On Mon, Nov 08, 2010 at 06:26:33PM +0200, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 08, 2010 at 07:52:12AM -0700, Alex Williamson wrote:
> > On Mon, 2010-11-08 at 13:22 +0200, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > > On Mon, Oct 04, 2010 at 03:53:11PM -0600, Alex Williamson wrote:
> > > > pcibus_dev_print() w
On Mon, Nov 08, 2010 at 09:36:59AM -0700, Alex Williamson wrote:
> On Mon, 2010-11-08 at 18:26 +0200, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > On Mon, Nov 08, 2010 at 07:52:12AM -0700, Alex Williamson wrote:
> > > On Mon, 2010-11-08 at 13:22 +0200, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > > > On Mon, Oct 04, 2010 at 03:
On Mon, 2010-11-08 at 18:26 +0200, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 08, 2010 at 07:52:12AM -0700, Alex Williamson wrote:
> > On Mon, 2010-11-08 at 13:22 +0200, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > > On Mon, Oct 04, 2010 at 03:53:11PM -0600, Alex Williamson wrote:
> > > > pcibus_dev_print() was erro
On Mon, Nov 08, 2010 at 07:52:12AM -0700, Alex Williamson wrote:
> On Mon, 2010-11-08 at 13:22 +0200, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > On Mon, Oct 04, 2010 at 03:53:11PM -0600, Alex Williamson wrote:
> > > pcibus_dev_print() was erroneously retrieving the device bus
> > > number from the secondary bus
On Mon, 2010-11-08 at 13:22 +0200, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 04, 2010 at 03:53:11PM -0600, Alex Williamson wrote:
> > pcibus_dev_print() was erroneously retrieving the device bus
> > number from the secondary bus number offset of the device
> > instead of the bridge above the device.
On Mon, Oct 04, 2010 at 03:53:11PM -0600, Alex Williamson wrote:
> pcibus_dev_print() was erroneously retrieving the device bus
> number from the secondary bus number offset of the device
> instead of the bridge above the device. This ends of landing
> in the 2nd byte of the 3rd BAR for devices, w
47 matches
Mail list logo