On Thu, 2007-10-04 at 12:20 +0100, Thiemo Seufer wrote:
> J. Mayer wrote:
> [snip]
> > The thing I see is different is that the n32 ABI redefines elf_greg_t
> > and elf_caddr_t as 32 bits. Maybe I missed something but those types
> > seem not to be used by the ELF loader (or maybe I should look in
J. Mayer wrote:
[snip]
> The thing I see is different is that the n32 ABI redefines elf_greg_t
> and elf_caddr_t as 32 bits. Maybe I missed something but those types
> seem not to be used by the ELF loader (or maybe I should look in a more
> recent kernel ;-) ).
> Then, I have seen no apparent issu
On Mon, 2007-10-01 at 04:35 +0100, Thiemo Seufer wrote:
> J. Mayer wrote:
> > On Sun, 2007-09-30 at 17:09 +0200, J. Mayer wrote:
> > > On Sun, 2007-09-30 at 14:38 +0100, Thiemo Seufer wrote:
> > > > J. Mayer wrote:
> > > > > Following what I've done in the syscalls emulation routines, it
> > > > >
J. Mayer wrote:
> On Sun, 2007-09-30 at 17:09 +0200, J. Mayer wrote:
> > On Sun, 2007-09-30 at 14:38 +0100, Thiemo Seufer wrote:
> > > J. Mayer wrote:
> > > > Following what I've done in the syscalls emulation routines, it appeared
> > > > to me that there seems to be a lot of confusions between ho
On Sun, 2007-09-30 at 17:09 +0200, J. Mayer wrote:
> On Sun, 2007-09-30 at 14:38 +0100, Thiemo Seufer wrote:
> > J. Mayer wrote:
> > > Following what I've done in the syscalls emulation routines, it appeared
> > > to me that there seems to be a lot of confusions between host and target
> > > long i
On Sun, 2007-09-30 at 14:38 +0100, Thiemo Seufer wrote:
> J. Mayer wrote:
> > Following what I've done in the syscalls emulation routines, it appeared
> > to me that there seems to be a lot of confusions between host and target
> > long in the ELF loader.
>
> But the ELF fields are tied to the ELF
J. Mayer wrote:
> Following what I've done in the syscalls emulation routines, it appeared
> to me that there seems to be a lot of confusions between host and target
> long in the ELF loader.
But the ELF fields are tied to the ELFCLASS of the supported ABI, not to
the register width of the machine
On Sun, Sep 30, 2007 at 04:28:57AM +0200, J. Mayer wrote:
> On Sun, 2007-09-30 at 04:15 +0200, Edgar E. Iglesias wrote:
> > On Sun, Sep 30, 2007 at 03:39:15AM +0200, J. Mayer wrote:
> > > Following what I've done in the syscalls emulation routines, it appeared
> > > to me that there seems to be a l
On Sun, 2007-09-30 at 04:15 +0200, Edgar E. Iglesias wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 30, 2007 at 03:39:15AM +0200, J. Mayer wrote:
> > Following what I've done in the syscalls emulation routines, it appeared
> > to me that there seems to be a lot of confusions between host and target
> > long in the ELF loade
On Sun, Sep 30, 2007 at 03:39:15AM +0200, J. Mayer wrote:
> Following what I've done in the syscalls emulation routines, it appeared
> to me that there seems to be a lot of confusions between host and target
> long in the ELF loader.
> I tried to fix this. I also noticed that the image infos start_
Following what I've done in the syscalls emulation routines, it appeared
to me that there seems to be a lot of confusions between host and target
long in the ELF loader.
I tried to fix this. I also noticed that the image infos start_data
field was not computed as the Linux kernel does. As the ARM a
11 matches
Mail list logo
