On 17 January 2014 19:20, Erik de Castro Lopo wrote:
> When I implemented the POSIX timer syscalls a little while ago I got
> them working for my specific use case. Since then someone pointed
> out that the implementation was not complete and I'd like to fix
> that. The ticket is here:
>
> htt
Peter Maydell wrote:
> On 17 January 2014 06:33, Erik de Castro Lopo wrote:
> > I'm currently working on implementing a missing part of a linux-user
> > syscall. This syscall includes a function pointer for a callback.
>
> Which syscall? Callbacks from the kernel are pretty tricky.
> Basically y
On 17 January 2014 06:33, Erik de Castro Lopo wrote:
> I'm currently working on implementing a missing part of a linux-user
> syscall. This syscall includes a function pointer for a callback.
Which syscall? Callbacks from the kernel are pretty tricky.
Basically you need to register a host functio
Hi Erik,
On 01/17/2014 01:33 AM, Erik de Castro Lopo wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I'm currently working on implementing a missing part of a linux-user
> syscall. This syscall includes a function pointer for a callback.
>
> If one has a 64 bit user space emulation running on a 32 bit host,
> how does one
Hi all,
I'm currently working on implementing a missing part of a linux-user
syscall. This syscall includes a function pointer for a callback.
If one has a 64 bit user space emulation running on a 32 bit host,
how does one handle the fact that the pointer might be 64 bits?
Does the fact that the
