On 08.07.2011, at 16:55, Alexander Graf wrote:
> I see. Qemu always gives you "best performance", as it can't throttle the
> guest
>:). Btw, I'd be happy to merge your custom board (or at least some components
>of
>it if they are reasonably mainstream) upstream, if you think it makes sense
On 08.07.2011, at 04:55, Lê Đức Tài wrote:
> On 30.06.2011, at 15:24, Alexander Graf wrote:
>
> > On 30.06.2011, at 04:11, Lê Đức Tài wrote:
> >
> > > Thank for your answer.
> > > Beside nbench, I'm also using Dhrystone to measure the guest cpu
> > performance.
> > > The performance does
On 30.06.2011, at 15:24, Alexander Graf wrote:
> On 30.06.2011, at 04:11, Lê Đức Tài wrote:
>
> > Thank for your answer.
> > Beside nbench, I'm also using Dhrystone to measure the guest cpu
>performance.
>
> > The performance does not much diffetence too.
> > Is the emulated guest per
Hi... :)
2011/6/29 Lê Đức Tài :
> Hi,
> I have a question about performance of Qemu for powerpc.
> When I'm changing the CPU clock for taihu board from 33Mhz to 330Mhz by
> setting the PLL value, the performance of Guest OS is not increased. I use
> nbench to measure the guest performance.
> Is qe
Hi,
I have a question about performance of Qemu for powerpc.
When I'm changing the CPU clock for taihu board from 33Mhz to 330Mhz by setting
the PLL value, the performance of Guest OS is not increased. I use nbench to
measure the guest performance.
Is qemu always running as maximum performance?
