On Thu, 17 Dec 2009 19:09:18 +
Jamie Lokier wrote:
> Luiz Capitulino wrote:
> >
> > Hi there,
> >
> > Currently, when a regular command doesn't have any data to output,
> > QMP will emit:
> >
> > { "return": "OK" }
> >
> > I thought this was a good idea because it has a clear meaning.
Luiz Capitulino wrote:
>
> Hi there,
>
> Currently, when a regular command doesn't have any data to output,
> QMP will emit:
>
> { "return": "OK" }
>
> I thought this was a good idea because it has a clear meaning. Silly me,
> this is optimized for humans, but for machines it introduces the
Luiz Capitulino writes:
> Hi there,
>
> Currently, when a regular command doesn't have any data to output,
> QMP will emit:
>
> { "return": "OK" }
>
> I thought this was a good idea because it has a clear meaning. Silly me,
> this is optimized for humans, but for machines it introduces the pro
Hi there,
Currently, when a regular command doesn't have any data to output,
QMP will emit:
{ "return": "OK" }
I thought this was a good idea because it has a clear meaning. Silly me,
this is optimized for humans, but for machines it introduces the problem
that such commands can't be changed
