Am 23.01.2017 um 11:28 schrieb Stefan Hajnoczi:
> On Sun, Jan 22, 2017 at 04:19:43PM +0100, Stefan Weil wrote:
>> On 03/02/15 23:12, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
>>> On Sat, Feb 28, 2015 at 04:29:44PM +0100, Stefan Weil wrote:
* It does not support secure access (https), so each login is insecure.
>
Am 23.01.2017 um 11:28 schrieb Stefan Hajnoczi:
On Sun, Jan 22, 2017 at 04:19:43PM +0100, Stefan Weil wrote:
On 03/02/15 23:12, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
On Sat, Feb 28, 2015 at 04:29:44PM +0100, Stefan Weil wrote:
* It does not support secure access (https), so each login is insecure.
Can we g
On Sun, Jan 22, 2017 at 04:19:43PM +0100, Stefan Weil wrote:
> On 03/02/15 23:12, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
> > On Sat, Feb 28, 2015 at 04:29:44PM +0100, Stefan Weil wrote:
> > > * It does not support secure access (https), so each login is insecure.
> > > Can we get a free server certificate?
> >
On 03/02/15 23:12, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
On Sat, Feb 28, 2015 at 04:29:44PM +0100, Stefan Weil wrote:
* It does not support secure access (https), so each login is insecure.
Can we get a free server certificate?
This is on my todo list. I'm travelling right now but will work on it
over the
On Sat, Feb 28, 2015 at 04:29:44PM +0100, Stefan Weil wrote:
> * It does not support secure access (https), so each login is insecure.
> Can we get a free server certificate?
This is on my todo list. I'm travelling right now but will work on it
over the coming weeks.
There are some gotchas:
1
On 02.03.2015 15:01, Peter Maydell wrote:
> On 2 March 2015 at 22:36, Claudio Fontana wrote:
>> Another suggestion for the QEMU website: improve the testing page,
>> adding at least one ready-to-run image for smoke testing for each supported
>> arch.
>>
>> http://wiki.qemu.org/Testing
>
> The th
On 2 March 2015 at 22:36, Claudio Fontana wrote:
> Another suggestion for the QEMU website: improve the testing page,
> adding at least one ready-to-run image for smoke testing for each supported
> arch.
>
> http://wiki.qemu.org/Testing
The thing about providing Linux system images is the awkwar
On 28.02.2015 16:29, Stefan Weil wrote:
> Hello Michael,
>
> here are some suggestions / thoughts for the QEMU website.
>
> * http://wiki.qemu.org/Main_Pagedoes not pass the W3C validator, see
> http://validator.w3.org/check?uri=http%3A%2F%2Fwiki.qemu.org.
> They can be easily fixed, but not by
Hello Michael,
here are some suggestions / thoughts for the QEMU website.
* http://wiki.qemu.org/Main_Pagedoes not pass the W3C validator, see
http://validator.w3.org/check?uri=http%3A%2F%2Fwiki.qemu.org.
They can be easily fixed, but not by normal wiki users.
* It tracks users (g+ image
htt
