Il 13/06/2014 15:21, Peter Maydell ha scritto:
On 13 June 2014 13:49, kostas kotzak wrote:
> It seems that COREMU multi-thread approach is very simple and effective. Is
> there a reason that QEMU org does not adopt any of these solutions? At least
> for the two most popular architectures x86 an
On 13 June 2014 13:49, kostas kotzak wrote:
> It seems that COREMU multi-thread approach is very simple and effective. Is
> there a reason that QEMU org does not adopt any of these solutions? At least
> for the two most popular architectures x86 and ARM?
The short answer is "because there's a big
Hi to all and thank you for your great work!
I'm Kostas, a PhD student in Chemistry 8-) but with great interest in Computing
(I finished my MSc Degree in software engineering recently).
As new and naive here I may ask a stupid question and forgive me for that.
I have collected information on QE