On Tue, Mar 24, 2015 at 8:04 AM, jacob jacob wrote:
>
> The issue is running dpdk from within the vm itself. Is it possible
> that the igb_uio driver needs additional updates/functionality to be
> at parity with 1.2.37 version of i40e driver?
>
At this point I think you need to work with the DPDK
On Tue, Mar 24, 2015 at 10:53 AM, Shannon Nelson
wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 24, 2015 at 7:13 AM, jacob jacob wrote:
>> After update to latest firmware and using version 1.2.37 of i40e
>> driver, things are looking better with PCI passthrough.
>>
>> ]# ethtool -i eth3
>> driver: i40e
>> version: 1.2.37
On Tue, Mar 24, 2015 at 7:13 AM, jacob jacob wrote:
> After update to latest firmware and using version 1.2.37 of i40e
> driver, things are looking better with PCI passthrough.
>
> ]# ethtool -i eth3
> driver: i40e
> version: 1.2.37
> firmware-version: f4.33.31377 a1.2 n4.42 e1930
> bus-info:
After update to latest firmware and using version 1.2.37 of i40e
driver, things are looking better with PCI passthrough.
]# ethtool -i eth3
driver: i40e
version: 1.2.37
firmware-version: f4.33.31377 a1.2 n4.42 e1930
bus-info: :00:07.0
supports-statistics: yes
supports-test: yes
supports-eeprom
On 20.03.2015 21:55, jacob jacob wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 19, 2015 at 10:18 AM, Stefan Assmann wrote:
>> On 19.03.2015 15:04, jacob jacob wrote:
>>> Hi Stefan,
>>> have you been able to get PCI passthrough working without any issues
>>> after the upgrade?
>>
>> My XL710 fails to transfer regular TCP t
On Thu, Mar 19, 2015 at 10:18 AM, Stefan Assmann wrote:
> On 19.03.2015 15:04, jacob jacob wrote:
>> Hi Stefan,
>> have you been able to get PCI passthrough working without any issues
>> after the upgrade?
>
> My XL710 fails to transfer regular TCP traffic (netperf). If that works
> for you then y
On Thu, Mar 19, 2015 at 5:53 PM, jacob jacob wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 19, 2015 at 5:42 PM, Shannon Nelson
> wrote:
>> On Thu, Mar 19, 2015 at 2:04 PM, jacob jacob wrote:
>>> I have updated to latest firmware and still no luck.
>>
>> [...]
>>
>>> [ 61.554132] i40e :00:06.0 eth2: the driver fail
On Thu, Mar 19, 2015 at 5:42 PM, Shannon Nelson
wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 19, 2015 at 2:04 PM, jacob jacob wrote:
>> I have updated to latest firmware and still no luck.
>
> [...]
>
>> [ 61.554132] i40e :00:06.0 eth2: the driver failed to link
>> because an unqualified module was detected. <
On Thu, Mar 19, 2015 at 2:04 PM, jacob jacob wrote:
> I have updated to latest firmware and still no luck.
[...]
> [ 61.554132] i40e :00:06.0 eth2: the driver failed to link
> because an unqualified module was detected.
> [ 61.555331] IPv6: ADDRCONF(NETDEV_UP): e
I have updated to latest firmware and still no luck.
]# ethtool -i eth1
driver: i40e
version: 1.2.37
firmware-version: f4.33.31377 a1.2 n4.42 e1930
bus-info: :00:05.0
supports-statistics: yes
supports-test: yes
supports-eeprom-access: yes
supports-register-dump: yes
supports-priv-flags: yes
On Thu, Mar 19, 2015 at 1:15 AM, Stefan Assmann wrote:
> Interesting, the following might explain why my XL710 feels a bit
> sketchy then. ;-)
> # ethtool -i p4p1
> driver: i40e
> version: 1.2.37-k
> firmware-version: f4.22.26225 a1.1 n4.24 e12ef
> Looks like the firmware on this NIC is even older
On 19.03.2015 15:04, jacob jacob wrote:
> Hi Stefan,
> have you been able to get PCI passthrough working without any issues
> after the upgrade?
My XL710 fails to transfer regular TCP traffic (netperf). If that works
for you then you're already one step ahead of me. Afraid I can't help
you there.
Hi Stefan,
have you been able to get PCI passthrough working without any issues
after the upgrade?
Thanks
Jacob
On Thu, Mar 19, 2015 at 4:15 AM, Stefan Assmann wrote:
> On 18.03.2015 23:06, Shannon Nelson wrote:
>> On Wed, Mar 18, 2015 at 3:01 PM, Shannon Nelson
>> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> On Wed, Mar
I was going to try this on fedora 21...now not very sure if that makes
much sense..
On Thu, Mar 19, 2015 at 4:15 AM, Stefan Assmann wrote:
> On 18.03.2015 23:06, Shannon Nelson wrote:
>> On Wed, Mar 18, 2015 at 3:01 PM, Shannon Nelson
>> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> On Wed, Mar 18, 2015 at 8:40 AM, jacob
On 18.03.2015 23:06, Shannon Nelson wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 18, 2015 at 3:01 PM, Shannon Nelson
> wrote:
>>
>>
>> On Wed, Mar 18, 2015 at 8:40 AM, jacob jacob wrote:
>>>
>>> On Wed, Mar 18, 2015 at 11:24 AM, Bandan Das wrote:
Actually, Stefan suggests that support for this card is still s
On Wed, Mar 18, 2015 at 3:01 PM, Shannon Nelson
wrote:
>
>
> On Wed, Mar 18, 2015 at 8:40 AM, jacob jacob wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, Mar 18, 2015 at 11:24 AM, Bandan Das wrote:
> > >
> > > Actually, Stefan suggests that support for this card is still sketchy
> > > and your best bet is to try out net
On Wed, Mar 18, 2015 at 8:40 AM, jacob jacob wrote:
>
> On Wed, Mar 18, 2015 at 11:24 AM, Bandan Das wrote:
> >
> > Actually, Stefan suggests that support for this card is still sketchy
> > and your best bet is to try out net-next
> > http://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/davem/net-next.git
On Wed, Mar 18, 2015 at 11:24 AM, Bandan Das wrote:
> [Ccing netdev and Stefan]
> Bandan Das writes:
>
>> jacob jacob writes:
>>
>>> On Mon, Mar 16, 2015 at 2:12 PM, Bandan Das wrote:
jacob jacob writes:
> I also see the following in dmesg in the VM.
>
> [0.095758] AC
[Ccing netdev and Stefan]
Bandan Das writes:
> jacob jacob writes:
>
>> On Mon, Mar 16, 2015 at 2:12 PM, Bandan Das wrote:
>>> jacob jacob writes:
>>>
I also see the following in dmesg in the VM.
[0.095758] ACPI: PCI Root Bridge [PCI0] (domain [bus 00-ff])
[0.0
On Mon, Mar 16, 2015 at 3:49 PM, Bandan Das wrote:
> jacob jacob writes:
>
>> On Mon, Mar 16, 2015 at 2:12 PM, Bandan Das wrote:
>>> jacob jacob writes:
>>>
I also see the following in dmesg in the VM.
[0.095758] ACPI: PCI Root Bridge [PCI0] (domain [bus 00-ff])
[
jacob jacob writes:
> On Mon, Mar 16, 2015 at 2:12 PM, Bandan Das wrote:
>> jacob jacob writes:
>>
>>> I also see the following in dmesg in the VM.
>>>
>>> [0.095758] ACPI: PCI Root Bridge [PCI0] (domain [bus 00-ff])
>>> [0.096006] acpi PNP0A03:00: ACPI _OSC support notification fa
On Mon, Mar 16, 2015 at 2:12 PM, Bandan Das wrote:
> jacob jacob writes:
>
>> I also see the following in dmesg in the VM.
>>
>> [0.095758] ACPI: PCI Root Bridge [PCI0] (domain [bus 00-ff])
>> [0.096006] acpi PNP0A03:00: ACPI _OSC support notification failed,
>> disabling PCIe ASPM
>
jacob jacob writes:
> I also see the following in dmesg in the VM.
>
> [0.095758] ACPI: PCI Root Bridge [PCI0] (domain [bus 00-ff])
> [0.096006] acpi PNP0A03:00: ACPI _OSC support notification failed,
> disabling PCIe ASPM
> [0.096915] acpi PNP0A03:00: Unable to request _OSC cont
I also see the following in dmesg in the VM.
[0.095758] ACPI: PCI Root Bridge [PCI0] (domain [bus 00-ff])
[0.096006] acpi PNP0A03:00: ACPI _OSC support notification failed,
disabling PCIe ASPM
[0.096915] acpi PNP0A03:00: Unable to request _OSC control (_OSC
support mask: 0x08)
[
> So, it could be the i40e driver then ? Because IIUC, VFs use a separate
> driver. Just to rule out the possibility that there might be some driver
> fixes that
> could help with this, it might be a good idea to try a 3.19 or later upstream
> kernel.
>
I tried with the latest DPDK release too (d
jacob jacob writes:
> On Thu, Mar 12, 2015 at 3:07 PM, Bandan Das wrote:
>> jacob jacob writes:
>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> Seeing failures when trying to do PCI passthrough of Intel XL710 40G
>>> interface to KVM vm.
>>> 0a:00.1 Ethernet controller: Intel Corporation Ethernet
>>> Controller XL71
On Thu, Mar 12, 2015 at 3:07 PM, Bandan Das wrote:
> jacob jacob writes:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> Seeing failures when trying to do PCI passthrough of Intel XL710 40G
>> interface to KVM vm.
>> 0a:00.1 Ethernet controller: Intel Corporation Ethernet
>> Controller XL710 for 40GbE QSFP+ (rev 01)
>
> Y
jacob jacob writes:
> Hi,
>
> Seeing failures when trying to do PCI passthrough of Intel XL710 40G
> interface to KVM vm.
> 0a:00.1 Ethernet controller: Intel Corporation Ethernet
> Controller XL710 for 40GbE QSFP+ (rev 01)
You are assigning the PF right ? Does assigning VFs work or it's
Hi Alex,
Thanks for the response.
I tried both pci-assign and vfio-pci. The issue is seen in both cases.
i40e driver complains about data tx timeout.
# libvirtd --version
libvirtd (libvirt) 1.2.9.2
Name: qemu-system-x86
Arch: x86_64
Epoch : 2
Version : 2.1.3
Release
Hi,
Seeing failures when trying to do PCI passthrough of Intel XL710 40G
interface to KVM vm.
0a:00.1 Ethernet controller: Intel Corporation Ethernet Controller
XL710 for 40GbE QSFP+ (rev 01)
>From dmesg on host:
[80326.559674] kvm: zapping shadow pages for mmio generation wraparound
[80327.
On Thu, 2015-03-12 at 12:17 -0400, jacob jacob wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Seeing failures when trying to do PCI passthrough of Intel XL710 40G
> interface to KVM vm.
How is the device being assigned, pci-assign or vfio-pci? What QEMU
version? What host kernel version? Thanks,
Alex
>
> Hi,
>
> Seeing failures when trying to do PCI passthrough of Intel XL710 40G
interface to KVM vm.
> 0a:00.1 Ethernet controller: Intel Corporation Ethernet Controller
XL710 for 40GbE QSFP+ (rev 01)
>
> From dmesg on host:
>
> [80326.559674] kvm: zapping shadow pages for mmio generation wrap
Hi,
Seeing failures when trying to do PCI passthrough of Intel XL710 40G
interface to KVM vm.
0a:00.1 Ethernet controller: Intel Corporation Ethernet
Controller XL710 for 40GbE QSFP+ (rev 01)
>From dmesg on host:
> [80326.559674] kvm: zapping shadow pages for mmio generation wraparound
>
33 matches
Mail list logo
